An escort

[citygambler]

I posted on a previous thread. I wanted to clarify a misleading statement made by the mods. They stated a review I left was on hold because xxxxx a Domme who alternates between Sandyford and Smithfield challeng3d the review and because I didn't reply they deleted the r3view. This is not true after I left the review the lady opted out of reviews. She later opted back in. She has successfully challenged genuine reviews before. After she opted back in I checked my messages and replied stating the basis of her challenge was false. E.I. NOW state I never replied I can provide evidence of this I replied m9re than once. This throws up a number of questions. Did E.I. check whether I replied before they falsely stated I hadn't replied. Do they take into account the fact that an escort gas a history of falsely challenging review. Is there any point to the whole review process when an escort can get a review pulled by making a false claim about the review. If E.I. did check whether I replied why did they state I didn't. Why did they cl9se a thread and not give me a chance to reply on the thread.

[citygambler]

I fully expect the above to be deleted. But lets see

[citygambler]

Thanks and yea I get it. Just curious to see how E.I. respond

[TheNightShift]

I posted on a previous thread. I wanted to clarify a misleading statement made by the mods. They stated a review I left was on hold because xxxxx a Domme who alternates between Sandyford and Smithfield challeng3d the review and because I didn't reply they deleted the r3view. This is not true after I left the review the lady opted out of reviews. She later opted back in. She has successfully challenged genuine reviews before. After she opted back in I checked my messages and replied stating the basis of her challenge was false. E.I. NOW state I never replied I can provide evidence of this I replied m9re than once. This throws up a number of questions. Did E.I. check whether I replied before they falsely stated I hadn't replied. Do they take into account the fact that an escort gas a history of falsely challenging review. Is there any point to the whole review process when an escort can get a review pulled by making a false claim about the review. If E.I. did check whether I replied why did they state I didn't. Why did they cl9se a thread and not give me a chance to reply on the thread.

Good morning,

If you feel we have made a mistake here or operated in an unfair manner, please contact us through the correct method so we can look into this issue, or give your further information to explain you the situation if needed. Making a new thread regarding the same issue is not going to get a different answer.

Thank you,
Anne

[citygambler]

I already have tried a number of times if you replied then I wouldn't have posted. The fact you failed to reply left no option. It seems I'm wasting my time.

[citygambler]

Anyone who places any faith in the review process on E.I. is wrong. They block genuine reviews. Escorts can lie a number of times to get negative reviews removed. The punter who genuinely true to leave both positive and negative reviews is left looking like a fool. Why would a punter lie. When the site refuses to publish genuine reviews they are not doing genuine punters or escorts any favours and the censorship turns the whole thing into a joke.

[citygambler]

The fact they have censored this post and a previous thread proves this. But they are only fooling themselves. People will leave E.I. I for one am not going to continue using it

[MR-LOVA]

i hear you brother ...one of my reviews wasn’t published s it was negative and was told it was on hold...on hold for the last 3/4 months?? It’s not fair on new escorts advertising as many punters won’t take a chance but I’m glad I’ve a good few regular girls that are 100% !!

[citygambler]

When an escort lies to get negative reviews deleted and E.i. protects her. Despite being told by a number of punters independently of each other who have no reason to lie. They instead take the word of the escort because she is paying them. they turn the whole review system into a joke.