Originally Posted by
DummyResister
This to me is the real central argument.
The fact is never gonna change that some people are happier to have their lives managed for them, regardless of the law.
But the fact remains that most of us have protections under law, regardless of how abusive our work conditions may seem.
There's a very stark difference there.
To defend the notion of free agency when the state has made laws against your profession ... James ... you're not really that fucking stupid, are you?