Mediocre Reviews

[Rog]

I'm a giver,not a taker.

You posted about giving a ts a blowjob and taking the ts's cum in your mouth. Hardly giver material champ.

[Barney Rubble]

You posted about giving a ts a blowjob and taking the ts's cum in your mouth. Hardly giver material champ.

But I don't lie down and take it . For a noob you certainly know a lot of old posts.

[Rog]

A touch of Tramboitus with a lot of reviewers here. Afraid the lady will take offence to a bad review.
I know plenty of lads here who have written glorified reviews but when you pm for the low down they sing a different tune.
They know who i'm talking about.

You being one of them. You reviewed a escort and have her as your profile pic despite her changing her nationality more times than her knickers.

[ShadyDog]

Suzi is reviewed 4 days apart by 2 diff reviewers. 1 gave her 5 stars for foto accuracy, the other gave her 2 stars. She cud not av changed that much in 4 days. Can't trust reviews

[willie wacker]

I reviewed her

::

Looks like the clown can,t read

[willie wacker]

He's better than that Willie , he can even see things that don't exist.......

He must be psychic
Wonder did he see the ban coming

[rebelscouse]

I have had a few encounters with different ladies that have not gone as well as I would have liked but in such circumstances I decline to write a review as they may have had an off day / hour or it may just be down to me so I seldom write a bad review.

I was checking out a young lady in a well known location in D9 and she has 86 reviews all positive except for one. The person who wrote the mediocre review has written 22 reviews of which 10 are mediocre reviews (i.e. yellow rating) mostly from well known ladies with loads of positive reviews.

I cannot understand why he would bother to write a mediocre review.

I’m of the same opinion that I had one or two meetings that didn’t go particularly well but like you have said it have been an off day for the escort in question but one was definitely down to me and as of this I wouldn’t leave a review as it was a bad day for me

[Toweringinferno]

suzi is reviewed 4 days apart by 2 diff reviewers. 1 gave her 5 stars for foto accuracy, the other gave her 2 stars. She cud not av changed that much in 4 days. can't trust reviews

you can say that again as just saw her and your 5 stars are way off, nice lady but pictures are very outdated

[JAMESCORK]

I am prompted to post this after a recent PM exchange with another user. This was a PM asking me about a girl I had seen and had given a mediocre review for. I told him she was a lovely person, but warned, that in my opinion, not at all as attractive as per photos. He visited anyway because all reviews except mine said she was gorgeous. He found out she was not as gorgeous as expected. This seems to happen a lot. I see Zilch and others have had similar experiences.

Now I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but FFS... surely we all know what attractive is. This is not my first time bringing up this topic.

I do not review all I see. I will give a good review if I feel the girl was as per profile and great, or a mediocre review if she was not as per profile, but just stating that. If she was a "lovely" girl I will state that too, but I will feel compelled to answer correctly the two selections on the review system for "accuracy of photos" and "physical attractiveness". But if a girl was as nice looking as per profile but not to my personal liking I may not review, as I would consider that it might have been just me.

But I feel some guys get carried away. If she was so nice and did all you gave you all you wanted, when you review then state this, but if she was not REALLY not what you expected based on profile pics and stats, then please state this too.....

[ShadyDog]

you can say that again as just saw her and your 5 stars are way off, nice lady but pictures are very outdated

I just read the reviews. Iv seen it b4. Girls wit 5* on reviews but not 5* in person