Verified Ladies

[fingermouse]

I was just looking there and there are currently 584 escorts on the site, however 476 only are photo verified. That's nearly a 1/5 unverified.

I'm asking, should those with unverified photos be allowed use the site at all?

Are they not possibly taking business off the escorts who have followed all the protocols?

[TonyB]

Some of them are sound
Hard to tell which ones

Some just dont want to give all their personal details to this site.

I am a regular (ish) of one or two non verified escorts.

I would be more concerned about opting out of reviews.
Although there are some decent escorts there too.
Diamond Libby sometimes and Cassandra in Newbridge

[fingermouse]

I can understand some not wanting to give details Tony, however the photos they send to EI or details are I presume confidential. They can request then that their faces or identifying marks be blurred out but still be verified. The opting out of reviews is also a factor but there is a review section in the forum to address this if required

[Jaypee]

What’s the script with heavily edited/staged photos on EI? Never really seen too much of that before. Is it a requirement?

[NORBURY]

I was just looking there and there are currently 584 escorts on the site, however 476 only are photo verified. That's nearly a 1/5 unverified.

I'm asking, should those with unverified photos be allowed use the site at all?

Are they not possibly taking business off the escorts who have followed all the protocols?

I would say that about half is wrongly verified, just yesterday I went to see a verified lady, a real Megan Fox looker but got a Dawn French instead, a real transformation