Originally Posted by
Sailor
Good luck with that!
The single consideration EI has, in my experience, is to avoid any interruption to their income stream This is, of course, generated by their advertiser's subscriptions which in turn is paid for by the money you pay their advertisers. Allowing clients to post accounts of negative or dangerous experiences with their advertisers would constitute a significant threat to this income stream. EI, in my experience, doesn't give a monkey's about how their advertisers treat the clients they meet via this website. EI gets the advertiser's subscription. You get a way to contact their advertiser's. Their advertiser gets your money. That's where EI steps out. Whether you get what the advertiser's profile suggests you will, whether it's a good or bad experience, whether the advertiser attempts or succeeds in robbing you or assaulting you, the STD status of the advertiser, cleanliness of the location, whether the advertiser misrepresents themselves in their profile etc. are of no concern to EI. Your only recourse they'll tell you is to invite other potential clients to PM you so you can pass on the name. They don't allow clients to name advertisers or their specific locations in the warning section. Advertisers can easily switch off their review section. Reviews that recount dodgy experiences with their advertisers are blocked by the moderators. They'll advise you to contact the cops in the event that you feel one of their advertisers committed a crime against you.
' So Sergeant, there I was with my trousers around my ankles with this escort/tranny/ dominatrix and....................................,..........'
Again I say, good luck with that! and good job EI, sterling work in dealing with the situation I brought to your attention in my warning. See warning named ' I found a dominatrix going through my wallet'