Suspected Serial Rapist Questioned About Attacks on 12 Sex Workers!

[The Libertarian]

From Friday's Indo -

Suspected serial rapist questioned after violent sex attacks on up to 12 sex workers
The Romanian national has been linked to attacks in Dublin, Galway and Portlaoise

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news...-36133153.html

It is thought that there may be more attacks directly linked but sex workers have not reported!

There is some speculation that who ever committed these obscene acts may be a pimp trying to fight off competition, but TBH that sounds like a TORLER response!

There is no doubt that the new law has contributed to making the business vastly more unsafe!

Time to close Ruhama down, confiscate their assets and demand the resignation of Fitzgerald!

[The Libertarian]

Sarah Benson, CEO of NGO Ruhama, said: "We are very pleased to hear that this alleged perpetrator has been arrested. We have been aware that the sex trade is and always has been a dangerous industry especially when there is organised crime is involved. We are very pleased that the women affected came forward and engaged with the gardai in order to get support. This incident speaks to the inherent violence of the trade."

Sarah, loveen, isn't it odd that the victims of these assaults did not go to Ruhama to seek help, as far as we know!

[Sexy Sandy 69]

Sarah Benson, CEO of NGO Ruhama, said: "We are very pleased to hear that this alleged perpetrator has been arrested. We have been aware that the sex trade is and always has been a dangerous industry especially when there is organised crime is involved. We are very pleased that the women affected came forward and engaged with the gardai in order to get support. This incident speaks to the inherent violence of the trade."

Sarah, loveen, isn't it odd that the victims of these assaults did not go to Ruhama to seek help, as far as we know!

The victims did not go to Ruhama, they sought help & support from SWAI, who were instrumental in proceeding with this prosecution. Ruhama, did f**k all, but hey nothing new there.

It annoys the hell out of me, that Ruhama were interviewed & quoted in the article in relation to this offender. They have no credibility & no sex worker has any time for this organisation.

Sandy x

[Dom Dunn]

Sarah Benson, CEO of NGO Ruhama, said: "We are very pleased to hear that this alleged perpetrator has been arrested. We have been aware that the sex trade is and always has been a dangerous industry especially when there is organised crime is involved. We are very pleased that the women affected came forward and engaged with the gardai in order to get support. This incident speaks to the inherent violence of the trade."

Sarah, loveen, isn't it odd that the victims of these assaults did not go to Ruhama to seek help, as far as we know!

My god this woman has a neck harder than the proverbial Jockey's B!!

[The Libertarian]

My god this woman has a neck harder than the proverbial Jockey's B!!

The jockey is actually my favourite position as well!



And part of its attraction is getting to slap my Bs of the beautiful consenting lady's ass while I'm doing it!

I doubt I could ever have anything sexually to do with Sarah Loveen though, given what she has done, no matter how interested she was and it's a pity, she is a fine looking bird!

[doublewhiskey]

The jockey is actually my favourite position as well!



And part of its attraction is getting to slap my Bs of the beautiful consenting lady's ass while I'm doing it!

I doubt I could ever have anything sexually to do with Sarah Loveen though, given what she has done, no matter how interested she was and it's a pity, she is a fine looking bird!

I think this post just perfectly sums up how ignorant you truly are. You attempt to portray this as some major civil rights issue when essentially you just want the right to use someone else's body for your own gratification. The new laws are fair and just and any logical person can see that the only opposition consists of pimps and perverts and escorts with vested financial interests.

[The Libertarian]

I think this post just perfectly sums up how ignorant you truly are. You attempt to portray this as some major civil rights issue when essentially you just want the right to use someone else's body for your own gratification. The new laws are fair and just and any logical person can see that the only opposition consists of pimps and perverts and escorts with vested financial interests.

Complete and utter nonsense, there has been a discernable increase in attacks on sex workers since this insane anti sex worker law was passed!
Note in the post, you criticised, I used the term 'consenting'.
I haven't read many of your other 17 posts, but nobody with a ounce of intelligence would regard the new law as in any way fair!
I do support putting traffickers, where they exist and it's most likely in The Western World, only in the minds of TV and film scriptwriters, through the proverbial fucking wall!
And also any punter who abuses clearly non consenting sex workers or those incapable of giving consent or underage!
Actually to be honest if you consider as you have said these laws to be 'fair' then you are most likely at a level where you are so intellectually disabled, you cannot give consent! Of course, you may not be an adult in the first place!

[The Libertarian]

I would accept that my favourite sexual position joke post is out of line with the seriousness of this thread!

[doublewhiskey]

Complete and utter nonsense, there has been a discernable increase in attacks on sex workers since this insane anti sex worker law was passed!
Note in the post, you criticised, I used the term 'consenting'.
I haven't read many of your other 17 posts, but nobody with a ounce of intelligence would regard the new law as in any way fair!
I do support putting traffickers, where they exist and it's most likely in The Western World, only in the minds of TV and film scriptwriters, through the proverbial fucking wall!
And also any punter who abuses clearly non consenting sex workers or those incapable of giving consent or underage!
Actually to be honest if you consider as you have said these laws to be 'fair' then you are most likely at a level where you are so intellectually disabled, you cannot give consent! Of course, you may not be an adult in the first place!

Just because you keep bleating on about it being an insane law, that doesn't make it an insane law.

[The Libertarian]

Just because you keep bleating on about it being an insane law, that doesn't make it an insane law.

No, it is actually an insane law. It was enacted in the knowledge that it would cause harm to the people it purports to 'protect'!
It's the only which I can think apart from the madder law equating a woman's life in value terms to a foetus, where there was known consequences that it would hurt completely innocent people in advance of it being made law and those consequences were flagged well in advance. The madder law has actually led to womens' deaths!

Granted one of the more insane aspects of it did not make it over the treshold i.e. the JOC Recommendation on an apparently TORLER submission - to legally equate anybody - curious teenager, punter or sex worker perhaps looking for dangerous punter warnings or sexual health advice, downloading any escort related site such as escort ireland, with a paedophile downloading scenes of children being raped and abused! Not that's obviously bonkers, but a reflection of the type of asshole we are dealing with!
Also proposals to directly make sex workers homeless seem to have been dropped from the insane law which would have added to its madness!

BTW we all know The Pigz and TORLERS, in particular the more psychosexual pervert element among them, lurk around this site and quite honestly it's a fairly obvious stink, I get off you, Bud!