Yet you allow the original Thread Title to remain!! How is that not naming and shaming?
A modicum of consistency is all we are looking for here.
Oh and you stamp out blatant fake profiles, most of us punters can spot them at a glance why can't the moderators? #Hint, start with profiles that are all selfie pictures!!
I used to report these profiles, and after a day or so the pictures would get taken down only to be replaced with another set of fake pictures. Now if someone has form here, would it not be prudent to check that they don't try and continue their scam.
I once reported pictures on here that were from a 16 year old bikini model!! E.I. have a responsibility to the people who's pictures are being used here without their permission.
Last edited by TheNightShift; 08-06-17 at 07:38.
“Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” - Oscar Wilde
Bratsimpson1 (08-06-17), AyannaMelek (08-06-17), David Feckem (08-06-17), Mr Sweet Guy (10-06-17), Sexy Sandy 69 (09-06-17)
“Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” - Oscar Wilde
Bratsimpson1 (08-06-17), David Feckem (08-06-17)
Perhaps I was a little abrupt, but to me you post as if you are yet another reincarnation of dirt-bird or knickersniffer or Dick. Either way you are certainly clued in enough to have not been fooled for a moment by Ranya's profile. My apologies if I have that wrong.
The profiles I linked were so obviously fake that I felt I wasn't naming and shaming anyone, apart from Libby Powell, who seems to be touring Belfast tonight
There is a huge inconsistency in having a warning section where we can't name the dodgy profile.
I suppose at least these type of profiles mostly have an unverified stamp, so that's something in the positive column for E-I.
Best Before (09-06-17), Bratsimpson1 (08-06-17)
Most people look at this web site using a mobile device, and the unverified stamp as you put it is very subtle indeed, and one could go so far to say it's deliberately small and discrete so as to fool the punters and further facilitate the scammers. I still can't get my head around the E.I. watermark on all the pictures irrespective of them being genuine photos or not. Punters see the watermark and assume everything is Kosher.
I note also our Friend from D6 has had 2 fake photo reports in the past 24hrs going from Morgan Hultgren to Libby Powell and now back to Morgan Hultgren. Now I know she can't be Libby as you have pointed out she's working in Belfast
The whole think is a Joke.
Last edited by Best Before; 09-06-17 at 07:35.
“Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” - Oscar Wilde
Hi to all,
If you believe that an escort is using fake photos, then you would need to go to that advert, view gallery and then +Flag Photos.
Once you do this, you would then need to supply us with an activate and a valid link to show that the photos the escort is using may have come from elsewhere.
As a rule for us mods, we cannot just delete photos if somebody thinks they are fake.
So if you report it to us, then we will just tell you to go to the advert and report it there.
If you refuse to do so, but just complain then fake photos will not be removed.
Floki and co.
There's no need to be condescending, and without us punters help in flagging the fake profiles, you would be left with a sham of a Escort Advertising site, full of hundreds of fake profiles in turn destroying the credibility of the site. All we asking is a bit of pro-action regarding this, where you have advertisers that have form trying to scam, the site should have more rigorous vetting of the pictures before letting them be published, and not be relaying on the punters to have to spoon feed you information.
Last edited by Best Before; 09-06-17 at 13:45.
“Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” - Oscar Wilde