Vpn

[casman]

They might drop more if VPN reviews are allowed and the integrity of reviews is more important than the quantity surely.
If you allowed VPN reviews, wouldn't it just cause more fake reviews, more Escorts opting out, less reviews as a result of that, less reviewed and more doubt about the credibility of reviews?

Oh I agree quality over quantity any day, I just thought maybe they could allow VPN use for well established members who are trusted reviewers, I just hope the good reviewers keep on reviewing, because its now more than most we need reviews and trusted ones from reliable reviewers, there is way too many one review wonders about lately.

[gonzo76]

Shit wrong thread thought this was the visible panty line thread


My bad

That's two doors down!

[FatBastard]

It would be more useful for E-I to make a statement on how they would respond to requests for user information, given they are a Spanish company with the server in Spain. Have they even looked into where the law stands on their ability to refuse? Would they care?

[MidlifeCrisis]

They will only release this information with a court order and law-enforcement will not use this “sledgehammer to crack a nut” to pursue punters, and no judge would sign such a court order considering how trivial the alleged offence. In any case, even this is not 100% and this cannot alone, uncorroborated, be used as evidence.

As discussed in other threads, this bit is not true in the north, where the law has changed to make this information easily accessible to lots of agencies. It is currently subject to a legal challenge, which will delay it, but there is just no reason to take those risks.