are escourts trusted

[LLLLL]

If I am right, the HIV test only show your healthy-result for 6 weeks before. And if You got HIV virus in this period it wont be show on this check, you should take another one. 2x6 weeks and you are negative it should be ok if you didnt have unprotected sex on these period.

Thanks God, I am very carefully and lucky, I've never had any STD's and I am checking myself regularly!!!

[Ripvanwinkle1]

Do you cavanlad420 carry and aids or std?
Syphilis will eventually effect the brain, I'd get it checked out, if I were you.

Affect,,,,,,,,,

[Curvaceous Kate]

wil the ecourts carry and aids or std

Never had Aids or an Std and get regular checks. When did you last get checked? Who knows what you might be carrying round with you!

[The Libertarian]

wil the ecourts carry and aids or std

There is a lot of research that escorts who work in the developed world are less likely to transmit STIs than civvies this is down to a number of factors low rates of stis in the Western World in any case, escorts being fully versed in safe sex practices and realising that the client in front of them has probably visited many other escorts (so is promiscuous) also they tend to get checked on a regular basis and their earnings depend on being healthy and presenting themselves well!
BTW and this is not in any way to condone unsafe sexual practices in any way, but HIV for a male in a heterosexual context, while not impossible (Leicester were higher odds to win The Premiership in the year they won it), is very difficult to catch!
There is also absolutely no excuse for not getting The Hep B Vaccine if you work in this industry or indulge as a punter!

[The Libertarian]

There is a lot of research that escorts who work in the developed world are less likely to transmit STIs than civvies this is down to a number of factors low rates of stis in the Western World in any case, escorts being fully versed in safe sex practices and realising that the client in front of them has probably visited many other escorts (so is promiscuous) also they tend to get checked on a regular basis and their earnings depend on being healthy and presenting themselves well!
BTW and this is not in any way to condone unsafe sexual practices in any way, but HIV for a male in a heterosexual context, while not impossible (Leicester were higher odds to win The Premiership in the year they won it), is very difficult to catch!
There is also absolutely no excuse for not getting The Hep B Vaccine if you work in this industry or indulge as a punter!

To repeat again, according to The American Centre for Disease Control, your chances as a male having unprotected vaginal intercourse with an infected woman, is about half the chances of Leicester having won the Premiership, which was 5000/1, so its about 2500/1. And each encounter is a different event statistically, so the next similar encounter is 2500/1! If as is very very likely your female partner is not infected in the first place, I guarantee you, there is no chance of you getting HIV from her, whatsoever.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/estimat...behaviors.html

Risk level per 10.000 exposures, presumably not using a condom and with an infected partner -

Receptive Anal Intercourse 138
Insertive Anal Intercourse 11
Receptive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 8
Insertive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 4
Receptive Oral Intercourse Low
Insertive Oral Intercourse Low
Other^
Biting Negligible
Spitting Negligible
Throwing Body Fluids (Including Semen or Saliva) Negligible
Sharing Sex Toys Negligible

It beggars the question, why is it so prevalent in Africa? The answer is probably down to the poor state of health of many people there in the first instance, making them more susceptible to getting any disease.
BTW I state again that Leicester had less a chance of winning the Premiership last year than you have of getting HIV from an infected woman through unprotected vaginal sex! And guess what Leicester did win it! So Unprotected Vaginal Sex - Nein Danke!

[SteveB]

To repeat again, according to The American Centre for Disease Control, your chances as a male having unprotected vaginal intercourse with an infected woman, is about half the chances of Leicester having won the Premiership, which was 5000/1, so its about 2500/1. And each encounter is a different event statistically, so the next similar encounter is 2500/1! If as is very very likely your female partner is not infected in the first place, I guarantee you, there is no chance of you getting HIV from her, whatsoever.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/estimat...behaviors.html

Risk level per 10.000 exposures, presumably not using a condom and with an infected partner -

Receptive Anal Intercourse 138
Insertive Anal Intercourse 11
Receptive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 8
Insertive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 4
Receptive Oral Intercourse Low
Insertive Oral Intercourse Low
Other^
Biting Negligible
Spitting Negligible
Throwing Body Fluids (Including Semen or Saliva) Negligible
Sharing Sex Toys Negligible

It beggars the question, why is it so prevalent in Africa? The answer is probably down to the poor state of health of many people there in the first instance, making them more susceptible to getting any disease.
BTW I state again that Leicester had less a chance of winning the Premiership last year than you have of getting HIV from an infected woman through unprotected vaginal sex! And guess what Leicester did win it! So Unprotected Vaginal Sex - Nein Danke!

The likelihood of contracting the virus during a single sexual act is believed to be quite low, between 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000. So if an HIV-positive man has sex once with hundreds of different people, chances are he will infect only one of them.
Some African men and women have many partners. In many cases it’s not a case of having a partner and then moving on to another partner; it is a case of having several partners at the same time.
It has not been medically proven but it has been suggested that repeated exposure to the virus is a more effective way of transmitting it. In other words, sex with an infected partner over a very short period of time is more dangerous than the same amount of sex over a longer period of time.
Generating an HIV epidemic probably requires that people be exposed to the virus repeatedly.
Some African men and women have sex many times over many years with multiple (the same) partners. If one of those partners was HIV-positive, the relationship would prove very risky over time.

[The Libertarian]

The likelihood of contracting the virus during a single sexual act is believed to be quite low, between 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000. So if an HIV-positive man has sex once with hundreds of different people, chances are he will infect only one of them.
Some African men and women have many partners. In many cases it’s not a case of having a partner and then moving on to another partner; it is a case of having several partners at the same time.
It has not been medically proven but it has been suggested that repeated exposure to the virus is a more effective way of transmitting it. In other words, sex with an infected partner over a very short period of time is more dangerous than the same amount of sex over a longer period of time.

Generating an HIV epidemic probably requires that people be exposed to the virus repeatedly.
Some African men and women have sex many times over many years with multiple (the same) partners. If one of those partners was HIV-positive, the relationship would prove very risky over time.

American centre for Disease Control figures, which I cited, indicate a woman is twice as likely to get it from an infected male partner from unprotected vaginal intercourse than a man is from an infected woman from the same act 1 in 1250 V 1 in 2500. and in the case of unprotected anal intercourse, the reciver is around 14 times more likely to be infected by their partner than the active participant!

The notion of repeat exposures mounting up leading to infection is contrary to statistical logic as each event is separate from the previous one in statistical terms.

[alcatel]

To repeat again, according to The American Centre for Disease Control, your chances as a male having unprotected vaginal intercourse with an infected woman, is about half the chances of Leicester having won the Premiership, which was 5000/1, so its about 2500/1. And each encounter is a different event statistically, so the next similar encounter is 2500/1! If as is very very likely your female partner is not infected in the first place, I guarantee you, there is no chance of you getting HIV from her, whatsoever.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/estimat...behaviors.html

Risk level per 10.000 exposures, presumably not using a condom and with an infected partner -

Receptive Anal Intercourse 138
Insertive Anal Intercourse 11
Receptive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 8
Insertive Penile-Vaginal Intercourse 4
Receptive Oral Intercourse Low
Insertive Oral Intercourse Low
Other^
Biting Negligible
Spitting Negligible
Throwing Body Fluids (Including Semen or Saliva) Negligible
Sharing Sex Toys Negligible

It beggars the question, why is it so prevalent in Africa? The answer is probably down to the poor state of health of many people there in the first instance, making them more susceptible to getting any disease.
BTW I state again that Leicester had less a chance of winning the Premiership last year than you have of getting HIV from an infected woman through unprotected vaginal sex! And guess what Leicester did win it! So Unprotected Vaginal Sex - Nein Danke!

Why is AIDS so prevalent in Africa?
1:The virus originated in Africa so has had longer to spread there. There is some evidence that the virus may have transferred to bushmeat hunters thro cuts in hands or whatever, from chimpanzees in the Cameroon region around the time of WW1.
By the sixties there is evidence of the epidemic underway in cities like Kinshasa.
2overty and lack of availability of condoms.
3:lack of education and understanding of either the existence of the virus or of how it could be spread.
4:multiple partners among both sexes accompanied by unprotected sex.
5:translocation and migration of people to cities again allowing spread of the virus.
6:there is also evidence of the virus spreading along trucking routes with the drivers having unprotected sex with with prostitutes along the routes
7:concomitant presence of other stis, due to prevalence of unprotected sex increasing the risk of transmission of HIV.
8:untreated /untested blood being used for transfusions long after the developed world.
9:A stronger patriarchal culture where women may not have been in a position to insist on or even afford or know the value of condoms.
10:the dislocation caused by many regional wars often accompanied by mass rapes and perhaps women forced to offer sex for food/necessities /survival

In short, poverty, poor education, poor governance.

[alcatel]

As an addendum to the above, if someone is diagnosed with HIV in the developed world they will be put on therapy that should reduce virus shedding, sometimes to a negligible level, hence reducing infectivity. Also HIV positive mothers can be given treatment to prevent in utero transmission to their offspring. Such things may not be guaranteed in poorer parts of the world.
The problem in the west is where people do not get themselves tested and may continue with risky practices.
Dunno the prevalence of i/v drug use and needle sharing in Africa but no doubt it exists. It also continues to be a significant problem in certain areas of E. Europe eg Russia, Ukraine - again lack of awareness, state or NGO intervention and persistence of poverty.
And something that is very little mentioned, but could mass vaccination programmes in the past with reused needles have contributed to HIV spread in Africa, when the virus was already circulating in the population.

[SteveB]

As an addendum to the above, if someone is diagnosed with HIV in the developed world they will be put on therapy that should reduce virus shedding, sometimes to a negligible level, hence reducing infectivity. Also HIV positive mothers can be given treatment to prevent in utero transmission to their offspring. Such things may not be guaranteed in poorer parts of the world.
The problem in the west is where people do not get themselves tested and may continue with risky practices.
Dunno the prevalence of i/v drug use and needle sharing in Africa but no doubt it exists. It also continues to be a significant problem in certain areas of E. Europe eg Russia, Ukraine - again lack of awareness, state or NGO intervention and persistence of poverty.
And something that is very little mentioned, but could mass vaccination programmes in the past with reused needles have contributed to HIV spread in Africa, when the virus was already circulating in the population.

Reused needles is a problem and needles and other medical equipment that is reused is a problem even in hospitals. This is well known in insider circles but knowledge of this is suppressed because it is feared it would cause loss of confidence in doctors. Lack of confidence in doctors is already a problem with some people preferring local healers (who make good money) over 'western' medicine.