Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
I would stress may however to avoid the bill being repugnant to the Constitution (40.3) and indeed the ECHR, you would wonder if it was a deliberate omission which of course, may lead to a defence for the buyer.Originally Posted by The Libertarian
This insane bill may have more holes in it than Donal McGlinchey ended up with!
The Libertarian (22-02-17)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote