Originally Posted by
The Libertarian
According to the SWAI she did speak to some sex workers and according to their Twitter when told that it would increase attacks on sex workers, she told them so it will act as a deterrent to stop people becoming sex workers. If that is the case and that is the mindset behind this law and The Minister is vastly beyond her competence as it is, it cannot absolutely cannot be constitutional! I cannot see that a law can be introduced with the intention of harming people and stand up, how can it?
I would love to know why you think it's game, set and match to them, even at this early stage. PM me if you wish, but I cannot see that, however, the lovely Minister will probably be enjoying her several pensions by the time this law is overturned!