Dear Michael,
I'd like to draw your attention to the amount of students mentioned in the article below.
https://www.google.ie/amp/www.evenin...ndroid-samsung
Any parent with a pretty daughter in college is facing a high chance of her offering sexual services masked as something else.
1 in 5 for the tech, 1 in 11 for the University. Both roughwork, it is Sunday.
This bill will do nothing to protect her and everything to harm her. In two ways.
First is by pushing bad clients in her direction. Second is by putting her in a position where she is afraid to tell.
The "bad clever client" is a scary guy and he will target the weakest link among us. Right now that is the streetwalker, addict and lower end prostitute. College girls look like too much work.
With the new bill, the streetwalker becomes a liability with loose lips. The independent escort and college students who are clever enough to mask services become the safe alternative.
The statistics will fall. Some amount of ignorant clients will stay away. Knowledgeable clients will not, they will simply displace.
There are not enough independent escorts to deal with displacement and independent escorts know to stay away from bad clients.
Student girls are not equipped to deal with bad clients and they won't recognise when they are being preyed on quickly enough for it to matter.
This can include physical abuse of course but much more worrying is the emotional abuse that is a certainty with long lasting effects.
I've seen the emotional trauma of blackmail on a student and, I would do anything to keep bad clients away from these young girls.
You are sacrificing them to save streetwalkers and addicts. I'm not saying you should sacrifice either, find a way to protect both.
Yours,
Sarah Barra