You could also say that "the pictures in the advert are not recently taken" or "are outdated" etc.
This also would have been published.
Speculating and saying that, for example: "no way she is 28, she must be at least 45" will either be replaced with "she seems older than indicated in the advert" or removed from the review.
Depending on the remaining content and the overall way the reviewer choose to express himself and phrases it.
I have seen many nasty comments in the content of the reviews, which were not fit for publishing. Simpy aimed to cause upset to the advertiser.
There are ways certain things still can be communicated in a polite manner, without any loss to the content.
Last edited by LuckyLu; 17-01-17 at 14:21.
casman (17-01-17), FetishCherry (17-01-17), Floki (17-01-17), RayDonovan (17-01-17), Sexy Sandy 69 (18-01-17)
Ummm that wasn't he question Lu, it was about making reference to inconsistency with regards to advertising age and I don't mean one year older kind of thing, but staying the same age for several years or shaving off 5 years over night. Those sort of things are factual and it could be said that the age is dubious due to inconsistency of advertising.
ach, yes, that. sorry looks like I misunderstood.
this is a tricky one. we cannot stop an advertisers to take years off, and of course at the same time, most observant users will pick up on the fact that someone has been 29 yo for the last 5 years.
I do not think we have got a policy on that in particular, but will double check with the advertising team.
casman (17-01-17), Curvaceous Kate (17-01-17)
I have enquired with the advertising team and can confirm that if an advertiser wishes to state that she is 29, during 5 consecutive years we will not force her to change the age.
this is provided the age is unverified. if the age is verified the real age will be displayed and reflected in the advert.
I suppose it is a little random but it's only my own rule of thumb due to my own experiences. I'm not suggesting anyone else adopt it as we all look at a profile and use our own tricks to estimate how genuine it is.
Unfortunately it's the Photoshop era and a lot of fake details in many profiles that make this sort of mental readjustment common.
If a lady looks close to her photos and is as pleasant in person as she is on the phone I am very happy. The date on her birth cert is irrelevant.
It has been quite some time since I was carded for alcohol myself
Oh gosh Lu this is like pulling teeth. That wasn't the question either. No one is expecting EI to force anyone to change the age yearly, the point was that the client has the right to disclose they know it's not changed yearly or that it has changed radically if it has happened during the time frame that he booked. As in he might say, I saw this lady 5 years ago and again recently and she is still advertising as the same age. However she still looks amazing (let's make it nice). Would this be taken off or accepted?
I'm not gunning for it, as it's counterproductive from my side, but it would be good to know where we all stand.
i do not see the harm in mentioning they are a lot other than advertised, why are the rules being changed now and not for the clients well being either and it is again a kick in the balls for us guys