Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Case; E-I Members vs. Fake Reviewers

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    No nine but the guy has admitted it and the girls involved don't appear to have any link for example their various partners are not reviewed by this guy.
    I just think that we should not jump to the conclusion that the girls had anything to do with this unless you can find some link between them.
    cal

    Do you honestly believe him , why come on here an admit to being an ass. Would you not admit that he fessed up to deflect attention away .

    I also agree we shouldnt jump to the conclusions but ask yourself ,who has the most to gain from winning escort of the month.


    nbt

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ninebythree View Post
    cal

    Do you honestly believe him , why come on here an admit to being an ass. Would you not admit that he fessed up to deflect attention away .

    I also agree we shouldnt jump to the conclusions but ask yourself ,who has the most to gain from winning escort of the month.


    nbt

    Because he is a gobshite


    Just because someone may gain from something does not mean they had anything to do with it.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Because he is a gobshite


    Just because someone may gain from something does not mean they had anything to do with it.
    but it doesnt mean they hadnt either


    nbt

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ninebythree View Post
    but it doesnt mean they hadnt either


    nbt

    Yeah but given that there is nothing to suggest they had anything to do with it its a little unfair that they are tarnished by it

    If Patty had anything to do with it surely she would have got a few reviews for her Duo partner Manu

  5. #15

    Default

    god i cant believe the jury is out on this one, the above text is 100%

    i cant understand how u lads are still cynical and suspicious!


    theres no link between these girls, they're just loads of reviews from loads of seperate punts...... i do have luck now and again on the horses and we all have our own methods of finding a buzz..nothing suspect or unusual about that....

    i think it would be fair either to delete all my reviews although each oe does represent a single genuine punt over 2 months or so and since they all represent different punts, i suppose why should be either deleted or have a rat with them? afterall its a minority of you pricks who started all this by questioning the credibility of my various reviews---its time ye all woke up and smell the crap.......DREAMON seems to have started all this so what has he to say for himself?? its bad form to be questioning another punters reviews.. im sure lots of lads sitdown now and again and write several reviews on the same day about various punts made over previous months!!!!!!! we dont all be on here 24/7 like some of you tossers out there!!!!!!!!

    your verdict----RIC????????

  6. #16

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by irishcolm View Post
    god i cant believe the jury is out on this one, the above text is 100%

    i cant understand how u lads are still cynical and suspicious!


    theres no link between these girls, they're just loads of reviews from loads of seperate punts...... i do have luck now and again on the horses and we all have our own methods of finding a buzz..nothing suspect or unusual about that....

    i think it would be fair either to delete all my reviews although each oe does represent a single genuine punt over 2 months or so and since they all represent different punts, i suppose why should be either deleted or have a rat with them? afterall its a minority of you pricks who started all this by questioning the credibility of my various reviews---its time ye all woke up and smell the crap.......DREAMON seems to have started all this so what has he to say for himself?? its bad form to be questioning another punters reviews.. im sure lots of lads sitdown now and again and write several reviews on the same day about various punts made over previous months!!!!!!! we dont all be on here 24/7 like some of you tossers out there!!!!!!!!

    your verdict----RIC????????


    irish colm up for maggot of the the month!!!!!!!

    how about a rule- one week to post a review, if you cant do it within that dont bother.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,546
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default One week limit

    Quote Originally Posted by billyjt View Post
    how about a rule- one week to post a review, if you cant do it within that dont bother.
    As things stand, this would be a problem for touring escorts. The way the system works now, if you see a touring escort on the last day of her tour and her profile is gone before you get a chance to review her then your next chance to post the review will be whenever she comes back, possibly weeks or months later.

    I would suggest changing the review system to allow reviews of escorts whose profiles have been suspended within the last few days, and then changing the time limit as you suggest. It would be fairer on the escorts, since they have a much better chance of rebutting a recent bad review than an old one.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,241
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    No nine but the guy has admitted it and the girls involved don't appear to have any link for example their various partners are not reviewed by this guy.
    I just think that we should not jump to the conclusion that the girls had anything to do with this unless you can find some link between them.
    I have my doubts about your story

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by experienced punter View Post
    I have my doubts about your story

    I don't have a story

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,314
    Reviews
    7

    Default More dodgy reviews?

    I have come across this review of Ana and find it very suspicious.
    The reviewer Vaani2 joined on the 9 march 09 and last visited on the same day he posted his review.
    My problem is the last time he logged on to this site was at 12.11pm and left a review for a girl he met at 7pm. so he left a review for a girl he was going to meet later that day... maybe its just my suspicious mind but if you look closer at the reviews, there are a lot more dodgy ones than you might think.

    Adriana has a couple from the same guy, the only girl he has reviewd. look for your self and draw your own conclusions.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •