Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44

Thread: Review farce

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Have to agree with you here NBT, I've seen you suggest this before and I think it's a good idea and certainly would help.

    Maybe there's a reason this can't be done that we haven't thought of and if that's the case then maybe Patricia could let us know or give us her opinion on it........

    I would also suggest a minimum number of posts before allowing people to post reviews as any ass hole can set up 5 accounts and wait 2 weeks to post spurious reviews but if he needed say a minimum of 30 to 50 posts then he would need real dedication.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    I would also suggest a minimum number of posts before allowing people to post reviews as any ass hole can set up 5 accounts and wait 2 weeks to post spurious reviews but if he needed say a minimum of 30 to 50 posts then he would need real dedication.
    I had thought of this too Cal and it is a good idea also, but in fairness some of the better trusted reviewers are not big posters, or at least not under the some profile or user name...

    Do people have different profiles for the forum and for posting reviews???

    Am I scankman..

    PS- I'm not.....
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    I had thought of this too Cal and it is a good idea also, but in fairness some of the better trusted reviewers are not big posters, or at least not under the some profile or user name...

    Do people have different profiles for the forum and for posting reviews???

    Am I scankman..

    PS- I'm not.....

    No your Paws same as everyone else

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    No your Paws same as everyone else
    I've already been accused of, and admitted this..... for all anybody knows I could be you.....

    Actually I haven't been feeling myself lately

    And before any comments follow, there's a differance between "feeling yourself" and "touching yourself"......
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  5. #35

    Default

    I think to be fair that every punter should write reviews, and if they did you would find that the cream of the escorts would rise to the top, and leave no place for the rip off merchants. I myself have got caught out a few times, and I've made my mind up to review every girl I meet, so hopefully no one else will get caught. At the end of the day, I think that every escort needs to be treated with respect, but likewise, as the paying customers we deserve not to be ripped off. The celtic tiger is dead people, and I for one expect to be treated properly by which ever escort I chose!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    I've already been accused of, and admitted this..... for all anybody knows I could be you.....

    Actually I haven't been feeling myself lately

    And before any comments follow, there's a differance between "feeling yourself" and "touching yourself"......
    We have all been accused of that crime at one stage or another


    If you are me then who am I ????


    And how many angels can you fit on the head of a pin with your difference between feeling yourself and touching yourself I think we all know exactly what you mean

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    We have all been accused of that crime at one stage or another
    It's a crime???

    If you are me then who am I ????
    Well you must be Paws by deduction......
    Last edited by luther; 20-03-09 at 18:12.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Well you must be Paws by deduction......
    Thanks had me confused for a minute

  9. #39

    Default White flag is up! Ric-here's my reply to your email, i cant open your message!

    ok everyone, i wrote these reviews, all were genuine, genuine in the sense that all good reviews were given for a reason, the escorts in question were all visited, several times and a good service was always recieved by all.. i dont write reviews regulary so when i do, i write alot although they're usually over several months punting.. it certainly seemed that writing loads of reviews using the same name would be suspect so foolishly i made differnet names.. i am a punter and have no association/relationship with any of those i reviewed, therefore theres no 'conflict of interest' here..

    granted alot of good reviews at once appeared suspect but everything i wrote, although under different names was true, i do like to complement a good service and i feel this is only fair to the girls..

    patty baby in particular is a diamond and was visited up to a dozen times by me so i did feel it was only fair to compliment a good time with positive and complementary reviews..

    ok i do accept i was irresponsible in having more than 1 user account but look at this from my point of view:------ which would seem more inapprotiate, 1 username giving say 30 genuine positive reviews or say 5-10 different users giving 30 positive reviews????

    i have to say i'm at fault here, i put my hands up and take responsibility, i'm not bullshiting and trying to deny anything at all.. im being open and genuine about this.. it seems unfair to have a rat alongside these reviews, ok they are from the same person (me fein) but each one does represent a genuine visit and the reciept of a good and well-enjoyed service from the girls.. it would seem terribly unfair to me that these girls should have to have their webpages tarnished with my silly mistake---its only fair that these rat symbols are removed, all my reviews are completely genuine, dates are estimates as i've crap memory, the only thing here is that i have different usernames!!!

    thanks all and my apologies once again!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    304

    Default Irishcolm

    Irishcolm, did you think you were doing the girls a favour? did you hope for favours in returns? its rics call here but personally i think a rat should stay with your reviews until you prove yourself with other genuine reviews or else have just 1 review for each girl counted at the very most. what do you think ric?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •