Basic problem in World War One was that conscripts did not have the time to get properly fit so when "going over the top" could only move at speed of slowest man, leading to more causalities. Men tend to be fitter and stronger and faster than women.
Basic problem in World War One was that conscripts did not have the time to get properly fit so when "going over the top" could only move at speed of slowest man, leading to more causalities. Men tend to be fitter and stronger and faster than women.
Floki (31-10-16)
Curvaceous Kate (30-10-16)
I meet plenty men who are far weaker than me
And if put us both on the same training programme we might match in the end
Its all about training guys
World War Two did prove with SOE and the French Resistance etc. that women could be as effective as men in combat.
But, that was still some women, not all women.
With training, it is amazing what anyone can do.
But the next argument down the line is that the physical requirements discriminate against women (and against some smaller, weaker races of men) and need to be revised downwards. This already has happened in some cases.
Last edited by SteveB; 30-10-16 at 15:31.
That's a cop out answer slightly
Anybody with the correct training can achieve the standard
However the person must want to succeed and be determined this is a trait not defined by gender
In world war 2 the view of women was they are mothers
Today we see woman can achieve anything men can.
Physically I'm very strong without training I see myself how quick I can build on it when I'm focused and determined
However of a great love of beer and burgers
So I lack the overall displince well at this point of my life
I've competed in races in my.sport in men's crew in a men race while on my period which btw are not fuckin pleasant
But I used my aggression and determination and knew I'd done the training and guess what I was part of the unit that won the race
That I'm just shit hot at sport