Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Review

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyLu View Post
    Especially as it implied the escort allowing bareback which is strictly disallowed.
    We are in touch with the reviewer.
    In the past escorts that allowed BB if confirmed (hard to do) were also removed?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    2,350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    In the past escorts that allowed BB if confirmed (hard to do) were also removed?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    In the past escorts that allowed BB if confirmed (hard to do) were also removed?
    we are doing our job in the background, rest assured. we don't necessarily come here to brag about it. yet it is still being done.
    I can't help but think that either you simply dislike our page / forums or are complaining about a number of things only for the sake of complaining?
    Because if you are genuinely concerned about something you can always PM us, this is the quickest way how you raise an issue with us.


  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyLu View Post
    we are doing our job in the background, rest assured. we don't necessarily come here to brag about it. yet it is still being done.
    I can't help but think that either you simply dislike our page / forums or are complaining about a number of things only for the sake of complaining?
    Because if you are genuinely concerned about something you can always PM us, this is the quickest way how you raise an issue with us.
    Checks and balances I suppose, a number of things have reverted for the worse, some for the better, I like to know where things stand.
    If you wish to have a forum full of ass kissing lemmings then I am definitely in the wrong place.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Checks and balances I suppose, a number of things have reverted for the worse, some for the better, I like to know where things stand.
    If you wish to have a forum full of ass kissing lemmings then I am definitely in the wrong place.
    hahahahaha, no man, not at all,
    but grumpy men are not so much fun either.

    sometimes I wish I had more time, but if I have to choose between answering to a string of complains on how things used to be much better and aren't now and acting on improving them, I choose the second.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyLu View Post
    hahahahaha, no man, not at all,
    but grumpy men are not so much fun either.

    sometimes I wish I had more time, but if I have to choose between answering to a string of complains on how things used to be much better and aren't now and acting on improving them, I choose the second.
    You're doing at top job, you haven't banned me so you've already improved the place
    Last edited by anon361; 07-07-16 at 13:47. Reason: Say YET, I dare you :p

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    LuckyLu (07-07-16), Mr Sweet Guy (07-07-16), TonyB (07-07-16)

  8. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,019
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyB View Post
    Seems like a genuine review to me.

    Obviously this lady isn't suited to the job and frankly shouldn't be working .
    I think it's more than a stretch to suggest the Gardai should be called as she might me cohersed.
    I don't feel sorry for her at all, I feel sorry for the client
    Couldnt disagree more with this i firmly believe she was coerced and not scamming punters there is a big difference.

  9. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    4,993
    Reviews
    585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lfccork View Post
    Couldnt disagree more with this i firmly believe she was coerced and not scamming punters there is a big difference.
    Based on that review ???

  10. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,396
    Reviews
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyB View Post
    Based on that review ???
    I don't think there was enough in the review to tell either way. My point, and probably lfccorks as well, is that it did not seem to cross the reviewer's mind. I was not saying report it - just that the reviewer needs to open his mind to the possibility of coercion. He is in the best position to know if it felt like she might need help.

    I still think that you should never proceed with an appointment when the girl shows signs of being uncomfortable with it.
    Help Keyla fund her battle with cancer - give what you can spare.

    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  11. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    4,993
    Reviews
    585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MidlifeCrisis View Post
    I don't think there was enough in the review to tell either way. My point, and probably lfccorks as well, is that it did not seem to cross the reviewer's mind. I was not saying report it - just that the reviewer needs to open his mind to the possibility of coercion. He is in the best position to know if it felt like she might need help.

    I still think that you should never proceed with an appointment when the girl shows signs of being uncomfortable with it.
    The review didn't say that.
    It said this escort ( like so many others from my experience) advertise favourites they have no intention of offering in reality.

    But I agree if there is any suggestion of coercion then definitely don't proceed and contact relevant authorities.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •