punter of the month

[Best Before]

funny you mention that, I would love to see this one in practice.

what are the criteria then?
of course the advertisers would have to review you in order for you to compete for the title. (you could always opt out of the review system, don't worry )

so, the reviews in the advertiser category are marked upon:

Accuracy
Location
Appearance
Satisfaction
Value
Experience

What about reviewing punters?

Higiene
Generousness
Appearance
Manners

Any ideas?

Generosity should not be a deciding factory. We don't all have the same resources as Tom Rambo

And I could see a few brown envelopes being exchanged for favorable recomdations. The current referencence system is fine, I always wondered why other people can't see who the references are from?