Yeah why did EI get rid of that feature? It was very useful.
Yeah why did EI get rid of that feature? It was very useful.
Best Before (22-06-16)
She was in the daily mail I remember reading she all natural my instant taught was riiiigghhtt
Saying that something kinda popped into my head here
Copyright law and photos surely a girl as successful she made a few million last year I don't think from suckin cock for 80 euro she most likely would be smart enough to copy right all her pics.. now this girls ad is advertisement for a business using copyrighted pics (most likely) fake report indicating it's not her
Who holds responsibility should that lady persue the breech in copyright law
Ei who didn't remove it or the person who posted it
I'd imagine a lot of celebrities such as this girl georgia salpha what's her face wouldn't be too pleased having there imagine associated with a low rent prostitution
Just a taught
Best Before (22-06-16), Sexy Sandy 69 (22-06-16), willie wacker (22-06-16)
I have seen this model used on several occasions, and she would be within her rights to sue both E.I. for not talking down the pictures despite a full tread devoted to them being fakes and the escort/pimp that used the pictures in the first place. Might be harder to find them, i'd say they move around a lot.
It's rampant on this site escorts using fake pictures of Model/socialites posting selfies in various undress (Instragram generation). E.I. need to do more due diligence on the photos and not be expecting clients to do all the hard lifting. I have said this before, what happens if someone uses pictures of a minor for their profile, who responsible there?
It's a minefield
“Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” - Oscar Wilde
Sexy Sandy 69 (22-06-16)
Best Before (22-06-16), willie wacker (22-06-16)
If escorts submit fake pictures they should not be allowed a second chance, they should be banned from putting up any pictures otherwise they will keep doing it
gameboy (22-06-16)