Quote Originally Posted by General Lee Awesome View Post
I assume most people can tell the difference Kate but clients are stuck in a catch 22 imo.

When there are "Xxx has new pictures, wow" threads posted, if the pics are photoshopped, even just a little, we can hardly say anything negative and comment on the fact that some photographers make girls look like cartoons with freaky looking features and impossible waistlines. (There seems to be one studio in particular that does a complete horror job on photoshopping ive noticed).

I personally prefer natural pics with minimal photoshop and the selfie type pic, more accurate representation.

Also, those overly photoshopped pics i refer to, they actually turn me off, because in alot of cases, they warp the girls features and imo make her less attractive than she actually is, which is a shame.

Just my two cents.

I do understand ladies photoshop to blend skin tone, blemishes, tattoos etc and thats fine, but others……
I agree mostly, except the bit I highlighted, I dont agree with that, it certainly isnt fine but theres no getting away from that epidemic in the paid for sex scene worldwide. its one thing photoshopping a girl who will only exist on the computer/in magazines for satisfying a mans desires in his imagination and she is not available for escorting, its another thing using photoshop in an escorts picture AT ALL!

the imaginary girl like in a magazine is for wanking to/enjoying looking at, the escorts ad is for BOOKING HER in real life and should be a real life representation of her.