Oh gosh this is not me having a crisis or wanting to change. I've managed successfully for several years keeping to my principles, but I just don't get why you guys moan about photo shopping and then applauded it almost in the same breath. I was trying to open some eyes,
I'm not fussed about the wind ups. There is only one reason why anyone would want to deflect from the real purpose of this thread and I'm not surprised at who is doing it at all, in fact to be expected.
My opinion is that photoshopping to remove 'distinguishing' marks for reasons of discretion is acceptable. I wouldn't opt for photoshopping that made me look like a supermodel, as I'm not a supermodel, so why mislead guys with photos that bear only a passing resemblance to me?
Sandy x
In memory of an awesome woman Laura Lee RIP
It's so difficult to articulate just how much she meant. Inspirational, brave and irreplaceable - our hero.
Please do what you can for her daughter. Deeply appreciated.
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/glasgaelauralee
alcatel (11-06-16), Curvaceous Kate (09-06-16), funlover12 (09-06-16), JAMESCORK (09-06-16), SophieX (09-06-16)
Lol, don't ever change Rachel
Interesting topic Kate and brave of you to bring it up. As others have said, if a poster starts an appreciation thread for an escort it would be churlish and bad manners to point out how shopped the photos are. It would hardly help encourage escorts to contribute to the forum either.
Everyone can probably tell by now to what degree any photos are altered. In my opinion escorts like
Alexia Montero, https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
Nicole https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
and many others get it right with glamour shots on their profile and untouched photos in their private albums. I know selfies can be retouched too, but they help give a fuller idea of who to expect.
No one would expect anyone to point the finger and point out where the obvious changes have been made, but does that mean that you have to add to the post so there are 5 or 6 pages long of appreciation for the images? Do some of you do that knowing that they are not representative and are you doing it to gain favour or because you are trying to help the person or out of sarcasm?
I mean you guys have no right to complain is really the point. How can you complain when actively encouraging it? It really does give everyone full reign to do whatever they want and why should they care if it bothers you or not when in my eyes it makes you much worse.
Mind you having said all that it seems that the majority here don't actually read either, so it's a lost cause.
FullLife (09-06-16)
I agree mostly, except the bit I highlighted, I dont agree with that, it certainly isnt fine but theres no getting away from that epidemic in the paid for sex scene worldwide. its one thing photoshopping a girl who will only exist on the computer/in magazines for satisfying a mans desires in his imagination and she is not available for escorting, its another thing using photoshop in an escorts picture AT ALL!
the imaginary girl like in a magazine is for wanking to/enjoying looking at, the escorts ad is for BOOKING HER in real life and should be a real life representation of her.