maggots- how should they be handled?

[carlos marvado]

he may be a maggot but he still has the right to defend himself.

Maggot rights?
Maggot status?

I feel instictively drawn back to the 1960s......the hayday of the civil rights movement.

Cumon everbody, burn your bras (no not the expensive Victoria's Secret ones), take to the streets and lets protest about the war in Afghanistan, globalisation, the banking system and the high price of a leg-over.

Mari, pass the weed around brother as we all join hands. Everybody together now....." We shall overcum, we shall overcum, we shall overcum some day..hayhayhayhayhay. With hope in our hearts and a woody between our legs.......we're all going to cum today".

[Epsilon]

I rest my case.. the same tread in both general and soap. i have responded to one then i find that the same tread is in general chat also.. way too confusing.

[ninebythree]

i think the should be handled like this.................


firstly keep them in a tuberware box till you are ready to use.

secondly grab with ure index finger and thumb and place on the hook.

no u ready to go fishing


nbt

[luther]

PBG, as I said in my original post I wasn't having a go at you or paws and I fully accept you decision to move a thread (BTW, I think a thread is better moved than copied to avoid confusion) if it involves a moggot and to give them the right to defend themselves, however, although paws was mentioned in this thread I don't really think the thread was about him, or involved him to the point where he needed to defend himself!!!

[pats bodyguard]

I think a thread is better moved than copied to avoid confusion) if it involves a moggot and to give them the right to defend themselves, however, although paws was mentioned in this thread I don't really think the thread was about him, or involved him to the point where he needed to defend himself!!!

paws doesn,t have to defend himself, rather, since hes been mentioned in 3 post he should have the right to reply, and on topic. and since its a topic so dear to his heart, he would no doubt make comment on it anyway, so why not this thread? surely we have the civility to go to the extra bother of going to the soap-opera?

[luther]

paws doesn,t have to defend himself, rather, since hes been mentioned in 3 post he should have the right to reply, and on topic. and since its a topic so dear to his heart, he would no doubt make comment on it anyway, so why not this thread? surely we have the civility to go to the extra bother of going to the soap-opera?

If paws doesn't have to defend himself then why move the thread??????

And if he didn't have to defend himself then the only reason to move the thread was to allow him to comment on a topic that is dear to his heart...........Well I'm sorry but as far as I'm concerned you give up the right to comment on topics that are dear to your heart by being confined to soap land as punishment for breaking the rules............. Otherwise what's the point?????

Should we have the civility to go to the extra bother of going to the soap-opera????
To be honest it doesn't really bother me, the journey is not that arduous for me.... but those of us who have the freedom to post in other sections of the forum had the "civility" to abide by the rules....................

[experienced punter]

All hold him down pull down his pants shove a vibrator up his Jacksie hahahahahahahaha......