Missing Thread aka Censorship!!

[ninebythree]

there is no reason what so ever , that this thread should have been deleted .

Its called right of reply . Something we always had on this site and i hope we continue to have.

I think ric may have been a bit over zealous in deleting it.

Every one on this site is fair game for slagging or questioning . If the moderators want to exempt from this ,maybe they should not be allowed post and just mod.


nbt

[pats bodyguard]

there is no reason what so ever , that this thread should have been deleted .

Its called right of reply . Something we always had on this site and i hope we continue to have.

I think ric may have been a bit over zealous in deleting it.

Every one on this site is fair game for slagging or questioning . If the moderators want to exempt from this ,maybe they should not be allowed post and just mod.


nbt

i,ve merged the thread with this one

[bigpaws]

there is no reason what so ever , that this thread should have been deleted .

Its called right of reply . Something we always had on this site and i hope we continue to have.

I think ric may have been a bit over zealous in deleting it.

Every one on this site is fair game for slagging or questioning . If the moderators want to exempt from this ,maybe they should not be allowed post and just mod.


nbt

Thanks Mousey and Niner .............. you have it exactly right.

The "moderators" have it in their heads that it's "Paws Vs. The Moderators" and believe that every post I write referring to them is a personal Anti-Mod campaign ................ I have been against the Moderator idea when patricia was posting polls/threads (what happened to those results btw ) to determine if we should have Moderators here but now that we do have them I accept it.
However I now believe that the "moderators" themselves need moderating because patricia chose her "moderators" badly and they have made numerous errors of judgement.

This thread is a seperate issue to that whole thing as far as I'm concerned, this thread is me responding to a member (who also happens to be a "moderator") who cowardly posted in the General Chat section making false accusations against me ............... I have a right to reply and I will exercise that right regardless of the "moderators" (west, Bj & Ricky Boy) abusing their powers in an attempt to silence me.

If any poster here names another Member in his/her post then that Member has every right to respond ..................... if the "moderators" don't want to discuss matters on the boards with certain posters such as myself then they should simply refrain form posting and concentrate on moderating .................. in fact they are doing such a bad job of moderating that they really really do need to concentrate more on their moderating tasks in the hope of eventually getting it right.

Paws

[jammydodger]

Question paws...

If you were offered a job modding, even though you are and always have been against the idea completely, would you take it?

[bigpaws]

Question paws...

If you were offered a job modding, even though you are and always have been against the idea completely, would you take it?

I would now because now that we do have "moderators" then I believe the job should be done correctly and the current "moderators" are failing miserably so I would gladly rescue this site and moderate properly ................... see my "Declaration Of Moderation" poll (in my signature) to see what approach I would take to moderating.

Paws

[bigpaws]

i,ve merged the thread with this one

There would have been no need for the "Missing Thread" thread if Ricky boy (backed up by you) hadn't repeatedly deleted my thread .................. having said that I'm glad to see you are capable of eventually seeing sense even if you are attempting to bury my "Giving west The BIG Finger" thread in this one.

So now that you have reversed your decision and in effect over-ruled both west and Ricky Boy will this thread remain here or will I be forced to re-post it when the other "moderators" discover that you have allowed me the right to reply???

Paws

[jammydodger]

I would now because now that we do have "moderators" then I believe the job should be done correctly and the current "moderators" are failing miserably so I would gladly rescue this site and moderate properly ................... see my "Declaration Of Moderation" poll (in my signature) to see what approach I would take to moderating.

Paws

of course your declaration of moderation is fair, and all moderators should undertake the job with that mindframe... I cant really say thats been the case.

I do think as posters, we should all go about posting with some respect for others and the site. Its because of us as a group that it needs to be moderated, and everyones well enough behaved until someone arrives and starts causing trouble.

In terms of the job, i cant say whether or nor you'd stick to the declaration. Like west, some would say you can be a bit tempermental and quick to anger... Again, i dont know that you would stray from the declaration, but im sure you can understand Pat's reasoning, considering you two haven't been getting on too well recently.

[bigpaws]

of course your declaration of moderation is fair, and all moderators should undertake the job with that mindframe... I cant really say thats been the case.

I do think as posters, we should all go about posting with some respect for others and the site. Its because of us as a group that it needs to be moderated, and everyones well enough behaved until someone arrives and starts causing trouble.

In terms of the job, i cant say whether or nor you'd stick to the declaration. Like west, some would say you can be a bit tempermental and quick to anger... Again, i dont know that you would stray from the declaration, but im sure you can understand Pat's reasoning, considering you two haven't been getting on too well recently.

I also think that the "moderators" should have some respect for the Members of this site being allowed to post their opinions, their right to free speech and their right to reply ......... as long as the Members are not being verbally abusive in their posts.
I personally have been verbally abused by two of the current "moderators" and yet I did not respond aggressively to either "moderator".

We'll never know if I would stick to The Declaration or not .............. but if I was made a a Moderator and I did not stick to my own Declaration then I could and should be de-modded so to speak ................ some here are afraid that I might actually do a good job at moderating and show up the current "moderators" as the incompetents they have shown themselves to be ................... it's easy to say "Paws could never moderate, he's too this and that" etc but the fact is nobody actually knows how competent a Moderator I would make.

Paws

[jammydodger]

Thats a fair point, and until, or if, youre made a mod, we wont know.

Also, i read what west called you, which wasnt cool and seemed to be an immature parting shot.

I think the biggest problem is there is a little too much leeway for the mods, but i think Pats bodyguard has consistently shown he is quite unbiased and fair.

[bigpaws]

Thats a fair point, and until, or if, youre made a mod, we wont know.

Also, i read what west called you, which wasnt cool and seemed to be an immature parting shot.

I think the biggest problem is there is a little too much leeway for the mods, but i think Pats bodyguard has consistently shown he is quite unbiased and fair.

Really Jammy???
Then I can only assume you haven't seen this ..................

https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...html#post66937

................... read that and tell me how unbiased you think he is.

Paws