Eotm

[JAMESCORK]

As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.

I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.

am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
ps i am open to be corrected .

The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so therefore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.