Eotm

[willie wacker]

Planing and winning EOTM is a doddle....

Lol
Don,t say that to Rachel or she will kill you
No that,s what I mean by bending the rule,s
And know where and when to tour

[redforever]

If you get a red review in the month in question then it,s a -1 for that month only.
If you got a red review 2 months ago then that doe,s not come into the equation for this month.
Just because a girl got a red review doe,s not mean she cannot win EOTM

You have to be special lady to get a "red"review "

[willie wacker]

You have to be special lady to get a "red"review "

Jesus I cringe
Where did I go wrong
I'd say they hope you never give a review so or they will never win EOTM

[Westsidex]

i am probably stupid

hhahahahahaha

Westside.

[LuckyLu]

i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

Hello everyone and a very good morning!!

Very quickly I would like to address the question of eligibility – there are 2 things:
Review submission (creation) date and booking date.

We are looking at the reviews creation date - taking into account all reviews received between 01/02/2016 00.00.01 and 29/02/19 23.59.59.
As you are aware you can write a review for an appointment taking place up to 28 days back.
I see no point in double filtering and missing some reviews out.

Either that or we would have to announce the winners with a month’s delay.

If we wanted to make sure that we look at the booking date too, then we only could announce the winner 28 days after each month’s end.
Then we would only be sure that all the reviews for this month’s appointments are in.

As it is today, we base the scores on the reviews received that month.

This means that today (06/03/16), you can write a review for an escort reviewing a booking which took place on 27/02/16.
This review will no longer be counted towards the last Escort of the Months, as we have closed that month and announced the winner, however your review will count towards the next month’s competition.
Otherwise it would be lost in translation and score no points as submitted after the month’s end.

I hope this clears the eligibility issues.

Then there are few more factors on the top of that, to protect the system from abuse.

We only count the reviews from established users.
Ratted reviews award negative points
Only the first review counts from the same punter for the same escort towards the EOM competition.

Although we are allowing you to review the same lady even once a week, the rules to the EOM did not change.
It is only the first review that you submitted for that escort (ever) that will count.
Even if it was in 2013.

maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm

In answer to your question, this would be manual as the new system, just gives us the winner.
We have no longer access got to the table, where we would observe the stats every day, hour, minute.
This was done on purpose as in the past escorts would enquire half month through, how are the stats looking and push some reviews.

We could maybe meet half way there and provide you them on request?
I have got nothing to hide, it is simply a ball ache. I have spent 2 days only sorting out forums drama and re-counting the reviews.
Don't get me wrong, I love my job, I am just aware that you needed me elsewhere (for example on the Pandora thread) and my time had to go here instead.

Now, going back to numbers, if this brings you some consolation, knowing that we did not just select this month’s winner at random.
Anabella had 6 eligible reviews (created between 01/02/16 and 29/02/19), Jessyca Wild 5, Apple 5, Katty and Bridgitte 4.

As usual let us know if you have any further questions or suggestions.

[redforever]

So what your saying is if a lady was shrewd enough and really wanting to win eotm she could get her clients from the previous month to hold off writing a review for her until the current month plus her actual reviews for the current month also ? ?

[LuckyLu]

[willie wacker]

So what your saying is if a lady was shrewd enough and really wanting to win eotm she could get her clients from the previous month to hold off writing a review for her until the current month plus her actual reviews for the current month also ? ?

Jasus your slow this weather
The 2 years in jail has taken its toll on you
Did it ever occur to you that a girl with over 300 reviews has never won ???
Careful planning is the key to success

[easygo]

Hello everyone and a very good morning!!

Very quickly I would like to address the question of eligibility – there are 2 things:
Review submission (creation) date and booking date.

We are looking at the reviews creation date - taking into account all reviews received between 01/02/2016 00.00.01 and 29/02/19 23.59.59.
As you are aware you can write a review for an appointment taking place up to 28 days back.
I see no point in double filtering and missing some reviews out.

Either that or we would have to announce the winners with a month’s delay.

If we wanted to make sure that we look at the booking date too, then we only could announce the winner 28 days after each month’s end.
Then we would only be sure that all the reviews for this month’s appointments are in.

As it is today, we base the scores on the reviews received that month.

This means that today (06/03/16), you can write a review for an escort reviewing a booking which took place on 27/02/16.
This review will no longer be counted towards the last Escort of the Months, as we have closed that month and announced the winner, however your review will count towards the next month’s competition.
Otherwise it would be lost in translation and score no points as submitted after the month’s end.

I hope this clears the eligibility issues.

Then there are few more factors on the top of that, to protect the system from abuse.

We only count the reviews from established users.
Ratted reviews award negative points
Only the first review counts from the same punter for the same escort towards the EOM competition.

Although we are allowing you to review the same lady even once a week, the rules to the EOM did not change.
It is only the first review that you submitted for that escort (ever) that will count.
Even if it was in 2013.



In answer to your question, this would be manual as the new system, just gives us the winner.
We have no longer access got to the table, where we would observe the stats every day, hour, minute.
This was done on purpose as in the past escorts would enquire half month through, how are the stats looking and push some reviews.

We could maybe meet half way there and provide you them on request?
I have got nothing to hide, it is simply a ball ache. I have spent 2 days only sorting out forums drama and re-counting the reviews.
Don't get me wrong, I love my job, I am just aware that you needed me elsewhere (for example on the Pandora thread) and my time had to go here instead.

Now, going back to numbers, if this brings you some consolation, knowing that we did not just select this month’s winner at random.
Anabella had 6 eligible reviews (created between 01/02/16 and 29/02/19), Jessyca Wild 5, Apple 5, Katty and Bridgitte 4.

As usual let us know if you have any further questions or suggestions.

sorry.do not want to be picky .maybe i am blind as well as stupid but can only see 5 eligible reviews on list not 6
date of visit 27/1.17/2.18/2.19/2.21/2. reviewers 30/47/21/41/15reviews .do not know where no 6 comes from sorry again

[LuckyLu]

sorry.do not want to be picky .maybe i am blind as well as stupid but can only see 5 eligible reviews on list not 6
date of visit 27/1.17/2.18/2.19/2.21/2. reviewers 30/47/21/41/15reviews .do not know where no 6 comes from sorry again

Hey, neither blind nor stupid.

We simply have got access to more data hence you do not get the full picture and thus it might seem that there are some discrepancies.

Not sure if you are aware that when an escort is opting out of the reviews your reviews of this escort are not showing. There are still active and approved, but not displayed.
This means that on the website the amount of your reviews (in brackets) changes as per the number of the reviews currently being published.

(Hence all those questions appearing now and then "why is my review missing?")

Although the number might seem lower, you might have written more reviews, they are just not showing at the moment.
But in our eyes you are still meeting the 10+ criteria, if you have submitted 10th review and we have it published.

This does not include the reviews that are on hold, under investigation or deleted, however does includes all published, but hidden reviews.

For this reason it seems that Wirakoch has 9 reviews and is not eligible, but some of the reviews he produced are hidden as the escort(s) has(ve) opted out of the reviews.
In reality he has got more than 10.