Casman Banned ???

[Quattroporte]

There is a green banner up top with a button for massage
I suggest you click on it and try get some of the tension purged,as you seem like quite an angry man today.

(Don't be put off by the massage cost thread that is also active................they are quite reasonable if you don't want a wank at the end)

Rather a lame comeback but sher if the truth hurts, ignore it

I'm afraid that's all from me tonight. Enjoy your popcorn

[willie wacker]

:
I'm afraid that's all from me tonight. Enjoy your popcorn

Feck the popcorn ,, it was pancake for me tonight

[xagerate]

Rather a lame comeback but sher if the truth hurts, ignore it

It was nice to meet you

[Clueless]

Who is Casman and who was he when he was someone else

[Curvaceous Kate]

I've said for about the last 2 years, if there was an option where we could receive pm's, but get a self ban on the forum, i'd be the first to do that. I just can't sacrifice a permanent ban as a lot of my business is done via pm.

I don't enjoy the way the forum is going anymore to be honest. It has a changed a lot, for the worse & i'm sure a lot of girls would secretly agree with me.

X

No secret here. I think the heart has been ripped out of it, but what can you do?

[JAMESCORK]

This place is a marketing tool as it,s the only place where escorts can market themselves in conjunction with their ads.
When I book Rachel it is always done by the pm system and that is the point I,m making about her ban.

Now this forum can be great for escort to help them get more business and why do I think that ???
I have done a few appreciation threads for some escorts here and they have come back to thank me as they told me business picked up a lot after the thread.
One girl told me her phone never stopped ringing and she did not understand until 2 days later when she saw the thread.
Not all your clients are forum members but most I,d say read the forum a lot but never interact

I see a few escort don,t have ads here anymore but use the forum to indicate they are available ,,,, so it must work for some

I concur... The boards are a marketing tool, and the boards CAN contribute to a girls business, sometimes considerably. But possibly not for all girls, but certainly did and does for Rach. EOTM 6 times... who do you think writes those reviews ffs. Is she EOTM 6 times by pure chance?... Pfff...

Escort bans should only be handed out in extenuating circumstances. I saw no such circumstance in the thread in question. The ban was given due to a behind the scenes little tiff between staff and Rach. I feel the ban was unnecessary, unwarranted and excessive. A mod needs to stay impartial and not succumb to personal grievances.

Lu seems to like to be seen to fly the "fair play" flag with her lengthy and heartening post... Lets see if she can practice what she has preached......

[willie wacker]

I concur... The boards are a marketing tool, and the boards CAN contribute to a girls business, sometimes considerably. But possibly not for all girls, but certainly did and does for Rach. EOTM 6 times... who do you think writes those reviews ffs. Is she EOTM 6 times by pure chance?... Pfff...

Escort bans should only be handed out in extenuating circumstances. I saw no such circumstance in the thread in question. The ban was given due to a behind the scenes little tiff between staff and Rach. I feel the ban was unnecessary, unwarranted and excessive. A mod needs to stay impartial and not succumb to personal grievances.

Lu seems to like to be seen to fly the "fair play" flag with her lengthy and heartening post... Lets see if she can practice what she has preached......

100 % agree
The dog on the street can see the real reason behind the ban
Now Rachel is no angel and show me a person who is and I,ll show you GOD
All she did was defend herself and tbh she has that right, in my eye,s and a lot of others she did feck all wrong

[Mister Anderson]

100 % agree
The dog on the street can see the real reason behind the ban
Now Rachel is no angel and show me a person who is and I,ll show you GOD
All she did was defend herself and tbh she has that right, in my eye,s and a lot of others she did feck all wrong

In my last post on this thread I typed 'there are no angels here'. Then I removed it, because I didn't want to get into what I was thinking.

For some reason there's a focused lack of tolerance for girls with a bit of spirit on these boards. I'm not sure if it was what Sophie alluded to a while ago when she mentioned chauvinism, but personally I think it is. There's a double standard here in regards to what a girl and a guy can get away with without the blow back. I'm referring to what posters consider okay, not the mods.

[willie wacker]

In my last post on this thread I typed 'there are no angels here'. Then I removed it, because I didn't want to get into what I was thinking.

For some reason there's a focused lack of tolerance for girls with a bit of spirit on these boards. I'm not sure if it was what Sophie alluded to a while ago when she mentioned chauvinism, but personally I think it is. There's a double standard here in regards to what a girl and a guy can get away with without the blow back. I'm referring to what posters consider okay, not the mods.

And we can be the problem

[Sterling Duchess Archer]

I concur... The boards are a marketing tool, and the boards CAN contribute to a girls business, sometimes considerably.

Members like to perpetuate this myth because they hope it will give them extra importance as a client. No matter if they protest that they never mention their profile name during an appointment. A lot crave having their egos stroked online. Perhaps they miss their trusted reviewer badges Ladies who have worked allowing reviews and without reviews notice no difference in how busy they are. That’s what I’ve been told. Posters forum users are a tiny fraction of client base and often hard work.

Escort bans should only be handed out in extenuating circumstances. I saw no such circumstance in the thread in question. The ban was given due to a behind the scenes little tiff between staff and Rach. I feel the ban was unnecessary, unwarranted and excessive. A mod needs to stay impartial and not succumb to personal grievances.

Lu seems to like to be seen to fly the "fair play" flag with her lengthy and heartening post... Lets see if she can practice what she has preached......

Rachel seemed to have the ear of the mods when samlad was here. Now she doesn’t and perhaps she has to play by the rules instead of bending them. Pendulums swing.