Back on topic please.
Where did my badly informed friend go?
Back on topic please.
Where did my badly informed friend go?
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
reminds me of one of those escorting docs on tv.* the one in it was actually about that ageOriginally Posted by EIFII
86?......and looking....well
*one of the good oness, the propper expose types, non judgemental as in no using hearsay facts just what you see is what you get, there was an escorting granny (popular with the younger clients too) and she was about this age
Could think of worse places to beJeez, so many guys up my ass, no room for my head....
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
back to troll school?
He did fail badly tonight but I expect him to up his game and return!
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
In fairness... you do have a nice assJeez, so many guys up my ass, no room for my head....
ladiesman217: April 2009 to April 2024
Goodbye
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
butt is there room for my.......erm..'head'?Jeez, so many guys up my ass, no room for my head....
#deviancy
Last edited by funlover12; 06-12-15 at 23:20.
Banned User
Becoming Addicted to E-I
sure you did
quoting Sophie but not aimed at you.
If she thinks E-I has an unhealthy control on the escort industry she’s entitled to say so, especially since she’s speaking from personal experience, regardless of the impending law. Surely she is more entitled to comment on it than know it all client posters.
Apart from her tendency to wander off point I thought it was okay. That and being a little caught up on the time and companionship mantra. But that’s common to many escorts.
She spoke realistically and positively about her own experiences as an escort, and didn’t try to pretend it’s a perfect world. That’s fine.
She said that criminalising clients was a bad idea, and that she’s against trafficking. That’s fine too.
The op took her quote out of context. She said it’s dangerous to fall afoul of E-I. Maybe she’s right. Clients can’t know whether it is or not.
It hardly merits starting a thread implicitly criticising LVT.
As I said, it’s a spiteful thread, to poke fun at an escort who has no ability to reply here. Saul knows this but is happy to jump aboard if it gets him some internet thanks.
Saul, just because you continue to relentlessly post shit, doesn't mean you have outsmarted anyone. It just means you have a lot of time to fill.
Goodnight all
Last edited by Quattroporte; 06-12-15 at 23:24.
casman (06-12-15)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
return of the sith*
should be silt thoug..just floating around waiting to be deposited at the bottom of a river somewhere
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Well said.it's very unfair and she has no opportunity to have her say.sure you did
quoting Sophie but not aimed at you.
If she thinks E-I has an unhealthy control on the escort industry she’s entitled to say so, especially since she’s speaking from personal experience, regardless of the impending law. Surely she is more entitled to comment on it than know it all client posters.
Apart from her tendency to wander off point I thought it was okay. That and being a little caught up on the time and companionship mantra. But that’s common to many escorts.
She spoke realistically and positively about her own experiences as an escort, and didn’t try to pretend it’s a perfect world. That’s fine.
She said that criminalising clients was a bad idea, and that she’s against trafficking. That’s fine too.
The op took her quote out of context. She said it’s dangerous to fall afoul of E-I. Maybe she’s right.T.
As I said, it’s a spiteful thread, to poke fun at an escort who has no ability to reply here
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
