Respect for escorts

[f1 away]

It was knocking all right

Oh shit that wasnt you

Wait are you knocking my beautiful solid wood queensize bed?

Actually that might not have been you either

[Naughtynatalie]

Fuck me fuck me that's my favorite story :

I bet there's a happy ending to that story too

[Petros]

It is sensible to run the entire competition in the fairest way possible, changing the rules at the end is not fair but neither would announcing a winner and then reversing that decision be fair, hence fairest solution is to have 2 eotm.


What exactly do you think is the substantive change in the rules that would have made someone change to any degree of significance how they work?

First off —*the winner has not officially been announced yet! That is Folk's job as SmileySarah told me to day she knew nothing about the competition!

Secondly, the change in the dropping of the rule "Reviews will only count when a) the reviewer has held a message boards account for six months and b) their reviews will only be counted from their tenth review." would make a significant change to the outcome of the competition, not to mention turning it into a total fiasco form here on as anyone will be able to submit a review and it will be extremely difficult for the mods to keep track of all the reviews as work out which are fake and which are genuine!

[willie wacker]

I bet there's a happy ending to that story too

Well there was Thursday and Friday

[greenie]

Only solution here is for EI to round up all those who reviewed both ladies over the month and pay for them to re enact the appointments and get them to re review making sure they have prior knowledge of the new system beforehand.
Ill take a pm from the mods to arrange my visit to the garden of eden
Ill expect a taxi to and from my door and there will be a few minor expenses incurred also.

[Petros]

Only solution here is for EI to round up all those who reviewed both ladies over the month and pay for them to re enact the appointments and get them to re review making sure they have prior knowledge of the new system beforehand.
Ill take a pm from the mods to arrange my visit to the garden of eden
Ill expect a taxi to and from my door and there will be a few minor expenses incurred also.

Ah hold on a minute — the mods have enough on their hands trying to sort out this mess to be organising trips to the Garden Of Eden

Besides, As I started a thread about this (which EI closed to save people from themselves) I think I should have first choice of dates for my visit to the wonderful place that is the Garden Of Eden

[Danny2011]

First off —*the winner has not officially been announced yet! That is Folk's job as SmileySarah told me to day she knew nothing about the competition!

Secondly, the change in the dropping of the rule "Reviews will only count when a) the reviewer has held a message boards account for six months and b) their reviews will only be counted from their tenth review." would make a significant change to the outcome of the competition, not to mention turning it into a total fiasco form here on as anyone will be able to submit a review and it will be extremely difficult for the mods to keep track of all the reviews as work out which are fake and which are genuine!

Whether she should have announced it or not the fact is she did, so now to reverse that would be unfair.


Your second point doesn't say anything as to how the change in the rules would be likely to affect how someone worked.

[Petros]

Whether she should have announced it or not the fact is she did, so now to reverse that would be unfair.

So, just because someone who earlier admitted knew nothing about the process makes an unofficial statement it should stand because it might not be fair to someone? But is it not also unfair on the person who played by the official rules to have someone come along who earlier admitted knew nothing about the process and make a statement which removed the rightful winner from the competition?

Your second point doesn't say anything as to how the change in the rules would be likely to affect how someone worked.

The change in the rules may not change how people people work — but it will change how the award is seen buy people and also how it is attained.

[Danny2011]

So, just because someone who earlier admitted knew nothing about the process makes an unofficial statement it should stand because it might not be fair to someone? But is it not also unfair on the person who played by the official rules to have someone come along who earlier admitted knew nothing about the process and make a statement which removed the rightful winner from the competition?

The change in the rules may not change how people people work — but it will change how the award is seen buy people and also how it is attained.

Both would be unfair which is why my very first post said both should be awarded eotm and avoid any element of unfairness to either.

If it doesn't change how someone would work then your team playing under one set of rules analogy doesn't make sense as the team would play the same way regardless of the rules.

[Stonie]

It can only be described as utterly disgraceful treatment of both ladies
Both top class escorts here yet both now subjected to unwelcome attention because of rule changes
Shame on you EI and any of you that condone or try to " explain " this
What happened to Respect the escort ?

By all means delete/ lock this thread but as Jerry is always happy to point out

"we haven't gone away "( punters )

Is that Tom's friend Jerry or Gerry Adams you are referring to here