FFS, EI staff, Rachel and Members come back to plant EARTH. loll

[Mister Anderson]

How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...

I read it with the voice of Leela from Futurama in my head.

[Bedders]

Some good points there LVT.
Especially for us to stop whining so they can fix the actual escort issues are you are paying to advertise.
Theres really no easy way to verify pictures.
You would just hope that when the punter opens the door and its clearly not her, he just walks away and reports it.
Sadly, Mr Willy takes over and that doesn't always happen


As I said before, I'm not sure how the law works, but I do know that all betting companies demand photo id and proof of address. photo id is a scanned copy of passport and driving license

x

[DreamCatcher]

I read about 7 words before my attention started to drift, what happened in the end?? Then someone decides to reply with quote!!! Do you know how difficult it is to scroll through this excuse for a website since it was relaunched? I know where I would like to launch it to...

[Jiberjabber]

It's a little disconcerting that so many people on this site chose to see a problem in relation to the person involved rather than seeing the problem for what it is.

[BradArmPitt]

It's a little disconcerting that so many people on this site chose to see a problem in relation to the person involved rather than seeing the problem for what it is.

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.

[funlover12]

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.

the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..

[BradArmPitt]

the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..

Have you met Rachel ? Do you believe the photos to be of her or someone else ?

[Jiberjabber]

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.

Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?

[BradArmPitt]

Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?

Who said my opinion was bias ? Are you saying it is a bias opinion ?

[Ladyvonteese]

How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
Seriously, you'd be surprised how many read my threads and post And the amount of support I do get for my honesty, the forum are not about the hierarchy that try and run it, it's about everyone who wishes to post their point of view on the forums. lol

I read it with the voice of Leela from Futurama in my head.

Well thanks for reading regardless who voice you needed to entertain yourself while doing so, each to their own. lol

You had an epiphany
Your response to the forum wait time suggestion was more positive the other day

And I still do but if you read all of what I wrote, then you would have seen I did not write about one particular subject and like I said after talking to some others about those wanting to change the way members are allowed to join, I am allowed to change my view whenever I think to do so and about anything with or without information etc from others also honey.
LVT

It's a little disconcerting that so many people on this site chose to see a problem in relation to the person involved rather than seeing the problem for what it is.

There was more to my thread then chatting about one particular person and if this had happened to two person then of course I would have mentioned both name etc and like I said my post was not just about one person, it was about more to do with other issues ffs all I did is mention a name of a person of what something happened to.
LVT

once I realised yet again (after seconds) there was once again no proof reading involved, my feet were pointing towards the door, but foolishly decided again to give benefit of the doubt only to have it thrown back in my face

needs summary..

it reads like a deranged person in the middle of a break down would write

Seems to me your just trolling as per usual, feel free to just move on and dont bother with my threads and post.
LVT

Was LVT not banging on a while ago about being recognised in a nightclub ?

Cant find the thread or remember exactly what it contained ....but I thought it was something to do with guys approaching her /drawing unwanted attention to her while out (possibly they were taking photos? and im not sure about this part in all honesty)

Regardless,she was not best pleased with being the centre of attention in such a public way while not in escort persona.

Not really a lot different to someone posting private photos of a lady (while not in escort persona) on a public forum I think .

And like I said in my thread no-one should have any form of personal info posted on a site or did you miss out that bit.
LVT

I didn't like to say "while not working".............sounds a little tacky

Why would it make a difference to whether someone is working or not regarding taking photos of someone or posting personal stuff about a person on-line

the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..

How the feck can a person be confirming a person is the person in a photos if they have never met then, my thread states what other said about what was posted about Rachel, jizz man I hope she is paying you lot good money to be making a thread about so many things to be yet again, Oh look at fecking me, everyone is having a go at me, ffs move on as there is more then fecking Rachel my thread is about. ffs

Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?

like I said we all have a right to change our view about any subject and yes I do feel for anyone regardless what they have done to me or anyone else over the years!

EOTM is awarded in arrears..... The winner at the end of August is EOTM for September.

Dont understand?

Its going to make EOTM very interesting!
I reckon I could be in with a chance, the way this site is these days

BTW how can you have EOTM September when September has only just started???

Anyway, if I wasn't so busy these days I would have met you already.

What is EOTM and maybe taking some time out for some fun is just what you need to clear the head and the pips. loll x

Some good points there LVT.
Especially for us to stop whining so they can fix the actual escort issues are you are paying to advertise.
Theres really no easy way to verify pictures.
You would just hope that when the punter opens the door and its clearly not her, he just walks away and reports it.
Sadly, Mr Willy takes over and that doesn't always happen

As I said before, I'm not sure how the law works, but I do know that all betting companies demand photo id and proof of address. photo id is a scanned copy of passport and driving license

x

Shame its yet again been made about one particular person and not any of the points I raised , And yes if punter were to post when its not the person advertising in the thread it would make life more easier for so many punter, instead of trying to get a website to do it. Loll
I have pre-pay cards on-line which I did not have to give ID for honey and even some here in Ireland its just proof of address that is needed without photo ID
LVT

What makes u think they did not?

Some think they have more power and to be able to effect who see's who and reads what but this is not directed at anyone person. x
LVT

I read it all the lady made some good points to be fair.
We all have our jobs and this site and it's ladies are our entertainment but sometimes we may forget its their job and their investment in advertising, rent, taxi, bus, plane fares etc

But notice how many people are responding to those points I raised and who many are directed at one person I used as an example, strange that after all the moaning to EI staff. Loll x
LVT

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.