FFS, EI staff, Rachel and Members come back to plant EARTH. loll

[funlover12]

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.

the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..

[Jiberjabber]

The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.

Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?

[xagerate]

How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...

Just ordered the audio book version on Amazon
Should be some poor bastard sweating his arse off as we speak (for shit money and crap working conditions) , while he picks my order.........according to Panorama!)

[BradArmPitt]

Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?

Who said my opinion was bias ? Are you saying it is a bias opinion ?

[Jiberjabber]

Just ordered the audio book version on Amazon
Should be some poor bastard sweating his arse off as we speak (for shit money and crap working conditions) , while he picks my order.........according to Panorama!)

Amatuer, it's already up on the pirate bay.

[xagerate]

Who said my opinion was bias ? Are you saying it is a bias opinion ?

Bias!

[Jiberjabber]

Who said my opinion was bias ? Are you saying it is a bias opinion ?

Nope, just asking

[BradArmPitt]

the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..

Have you met Rachel ? Do you believe the photos to be of her or someone else ?

[BradArmPitt]

Nope, just asking

. .

[funlover12]

Have you met Rachel ? Do you believe the photos to be of her or someone else ?

how many steps did your mother drop you down as a child, 4 was it?