Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 53

Thread: The ladies need to put some weight behind this idea !.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,825
    Reviews
    18

    Default The ladies need to put some weight behind this idea !.

    Excuse the detail........but read please

    A few particularly nasty posts from a troll with no spine just emerged.................(always when no mods online).

    The ladies value their anonymnity,security,discretion im sure? (They wouldn't want to find a private facebook ,or similar photo appear while no mods are online and no way to have it promptly removed I am also sure)

    I suggested before (primarily to stop the ability for anyone to sign up and immediately start trolling) that a wait period should be introduced before a new user can post.
    A troll who signs up and then has to wait 3 days,5 days , a week etc before they can post will soon lose interest if once they are banned,they have to wait another week before they can troll again.
    Im raising this again because previously Samlad showed no interest in the idea (maybe because no ladies were particularly interested in pushing it either).

    A wait time will not prevent new users viewing profiles or reading posts (business therefore will not be affected I would imagine),so why will it not be a good idea?.
    Many non escort forums allow guest access without allowing full access initially....why not here.

    Others may have better ideas?
    Maybe initial posts are moderated? (They wont go for that as it will use up manpower)
    Anyone got any suggestions?

    I hate writing such a long winded post................but it cant be outlined in the usual 2 sentences with a few smilies thrown in
    Last edited by xagerate; 01-09-15 at 18:35.


    Having recently lost the run of myself.....
    ....please indicate your level of satisfaction with this post as you exit.
    (All feedback is anonymous and used to improve your experience here)

  2. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to xagerate For This Useful Post:

    BradArmPitt (01-09-15), casman (02-09-15), Rafaella25 (02-09-15), dr love (01-09-15), DreamCatcher (01-09-15), Dutch1968 (01-09-15), Irish Fiona (01-09-15), Irish Sarah (01-09-15), Jiberjabber (01-09-15), Ladyvonteese (01-09-15), Melindablondey (01-09-15), Petros (01-09-15), Playitsam (03-09-15), Sexy Sandy 69 (02-09-15), Vitruvian (01-09-15)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    353
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    i thought that photo of R.D was a joke, was that really her?

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,825
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by truelad View Post
    i thought that photo of R.D was a joke, was that really her?
    I don't know
    The point is that it could be real and it could happen to anybody advertising.
    Just throwing it out there that there might be better ways to prevent similar happening again....but maybe not...no harm discussing.


    Having recently lost the run of myself.....
    ....please indicate your level of satisfaction with this post as you exit.
    (All feedback is anonymous and used to improve your experience here)

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to xagerate For This Useful Post:

    Ladyvonteese (02-09-15)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    353
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    more escorts show their faces to they not ?
    Her choice...and if that pic was her....awful photo!!

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,156
    Reviews
    20

    Default

    were did he get the picture

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,825
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by truelad View Post
    more escorts show their faces to they not ?
    Her choice...and if that pic was her....awful photo!!
    The escorts choose what pics are shared,and what ones are identifiable.........no one else should.
    Send me your real name and ill find one of you that shows more than the one you have on your forum profile (you hid your face in the mirror for what reason?)

    Quote Originally Posted by get20 View Post
    were did he get the picture
    Not the point
    It wasn't from the lady in question though.(if its even genuine)
    You say "he" for a reason?


    Having recently lost the run of myself.....
    ....please indicate your level of satisfaction with this post as you exit.
    (All feedback is anonymous and used to improve your experience here)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to xagerate For This Useful Post:

    Ladyvonteese (02-09-15)

  10. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,757
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xagerate View Post
    Excuse the detail........but read please

    A few particularly nasty posts from a troll with no spine just emerged.................(always when no mods online).

    The ladies value their anonymnity,security,discretion im sure? (They wouldn't want to find a private facebook ,or similar photo appear while no mods are online and no way to have it promptly removed I am also sure)

    I suggested before (primarily to stop the ability for anyone to sign up and immediately start trolling) that a wait period should be introduced before a new user can post.
    A troll who signs up and then has to wait 3 days,5 days , a week etc before they can post will soon lose interest if once they are banned,they have to wait another week before they can troll again.
    Im raising this again because previously Samlad showed no interest in the idea (maybe because no ladies were particularly interested in pushing it either).

    A wait time will not prevent new users viewing profiles or reading posts (business therefore will not be affected I would imagine),so why will it not be a good idea?.
    Many non escort forums allow guest access without allowing full access initially....why not here.

    Others may have better ideas?
    Maybe initial posts are moderated? (They wont go for that as it will use up manpower)
    Anyone got any suggestions?

    I hate writing such a long winded post................but it cant be outlined in the usual 2 sentences with a few smilies thrown in
    Good thread and like I have been saying things should when possible of course be made to ensure the personal details of are kept personal and what you mention would at least gone a long way to stop such things happening to anyone.

    Hopefully EI will take your suggestion on board at least consider it.

    All the best
    Lady Von Teese
    Now in London check out my new photos, over 200 free to view

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ladyvonteese For This Useful Post:

    Irish Fiona (02-09-15), Jiberjabber (02-09-15), xagerate (02-09-15)

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,051
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Has anyone considered adding this suggestion to the thread that is looking for fixes to the new site?

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Jiberjabber For This Useful Post:

    xagerate (02-09-15)

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,825
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiberjabber View Post
    Has anyone considered adding this suggestion to the thread that is looking for fixes to the new site?
    Ive raised it before a few times
    They keep saying it would restrict new user interest
    They haven't provided a better solution however themselves.
    Something needs to be done....not necessarily this.

    (The username who posted the photos earlier was still showing as online in the forum at 2320.......yet their profile says "banned".
    Can they not actually delete the user to prevent them even logging in


    Having recently lost the run of myself.....
    ....please indicate your level of satisfaction with this post as you exit.
    (All feedback is anonymous and used to improve your experience here)

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to xagerate For This Useful Post:

    Jiberjabber (02-09-15)

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,051
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xagerate View Post
    Ive raised it before a few times
    They keep saying it would restrict new user interest
    They haven't provided a better solution however themselves.
    Something needs to be done....not necessarily this.

    (The username who posted the photos earlier was still showing as online in the forum at 2320.......yet their profile says "banned".
    Can they not actually delete the user to prevent them even logging in

    So again we're back to what Lucy mentioned earlier about them caring more for site traffic than user security.

    All very comforting given the nature of the business

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiberjabber For This Useful Post:

    Irish Fiona (03-09-15), Ladyvonteese (02-09-15)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •