E-I Trickery

[Gary]

that's ridiculous , this site is pathetic as the best of times

In the interests of site feedback I have to ask.

If someone sees a girl that may not be the one in the profile - why should that profile get a review? (this is for me as i am helping with the tech fixes on the new site)

[willie wacker]

In the interests of site feedback I have to ask.

If someone sees a girl that may not be the one in the profile - why should that profile get a review? (this is for me as i am helping with the tech fixes on the new site)

1.She might have fake pictures
2.Let the review go up and let her comment and it,s up to the punters to decide.

Just my thoughts and can,t be 100% since I did not see the review

[Naughtynatalie]

In the interests of site feedback I have to ask.

If someone sees a girl that may not be the one in the profile - why should that profile get a review? (this is for me as i am helping with the tech fixes on the new site)

Because the appointment was booked using that profile telephone number. So whether its the girl in the pictures or not the number in THAT profile was used & should be allowed to be reviewed/reported.

Its either bait & switch, fake photo's or the room so dark you cant see whether she's the girl in the pics or 20 years older than the profile states.
All conning guys & imo should be reviewed/reported.

[Gary]

Because the appointment was booked using that profile telephone number. So whether the girl in the pictures or not the number in the profile was used & should be allowed to be reported on.

Hmmmmmm, would you agree that "reported" and "reviewed" were different? As in Punters should be "warned" maybe, as opposed the advert having a review? (thinking out loud here)

[Naughtynatalie]

Hmmmmmm, would you agree that "reported" and "reviewed" were different? As in Punters should be "warned" maybe, as opposed the advert having a review? (thinking out loud here)

I think of a review as being good & reported as being a bad review/warning! This guy in question wasnt saying it wasnt her but being honest enough to say he couldnt be sure because of lighting. I dont know whether the rest of the review was good/bad or neutral. But poor lighting in itself is the actions of a woman trying to con a man about age/pics/bait & switch. IMO.
Theres a massive difference in sexy ambience & actually being able to see the person.

[Gary]

Thanks Natalie,

For now we'll be keeping with the rules that we have been strict and clear on for many years (below), but once things settle down here i'll come back to the ideas this thread generated.

https://www.escort-ireland.com/help/...formation.html (Why has my review been rejected or edited? Rule K)

[tomlittle]

In the interests of site feedback I have to ask.

If someone sees a girl that may not be the one in the profile - why should that profile get a review? (this is for me as i am helping with the tech fixes on the new site)

Gary, you guys have to do something here as well, its not all up to the clients, you guys stick the adverts up and thus have a responsibility here too.. start by properly checking the Escorts profile and pictures and listen to what people say instead of verifying every tom dick and harry that throws cash at you..just because they pay the advertising fee, that does not make them genuine.
One example is an Escort using 3 Escort profiles, and even the verified ones, the pictures are false but that 3 revenue streams coming in for you so its goes to the bottom of the list in priority. This has a negative effect too on the decent escorts who have only one profile and are carrying out their business honestly.
I had this chat a few times with Sam when he was here but his hands were tied, info would be passed on but nothing was ever done about it. Waste of time really