Ian O Doherty

[ManHold]

For posts in a row! Am I non pareil in disguise?

I have to admit, you do sound as idiotic as him.

[Meursault]

the comments are interesting too in the article.

what i always find fascinating is how people adjust their prejudices. those for criminalizing the buyer say that prostitution is wrong, but then if you point out that every relationship or marriage is prostitution itself, and they will say that it is an acceptable form of prostitution.

People are kind of strange. they decide what is right and wrong to suit their desires. so a woman selling her body for hard cash is wrong, but a woman who gets bought a new pair of louboutins by her boyfriend is in love or whatever( even though its a trade all the same). They cant say prostitution is wrong and say relationships are acceptable. both are the same thing, but one is accepted and one isnt

"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." - William James

[Tumbleweed]

the comments are interesting too in the article.

what i always find fascinating is how people adjust their prejudices. those for criminalizing the buyer say that prostitution is wrong, but then if you point out that every relationship or marriage is prostitution itself, and they will say that it is an acceptable form of prostitution.

People are kind of strange. they decide what is right and wrong to suit their desires. so a woman selling her body for hard cash is wrong, but a woman who gets bought a new pair of louboutins by her boyfriend is in love or whatever( even though its a trade all the same). They cant say prostitution is wrong and say relationships are acceptable. both are the same thing, but one is accepted and one isnt

"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." - William James

Pseudo intellectual nonsense as always. So you are saying love doesn't exist?

[nonpareil]

Ian O Doherty is a "contrarian" just like Tumbleweed.

Although Tumbleweed did use a more apt word to describe Doherty a couple of posts ago.

[Tumbleweed]

the comments are interesting too in the article.

what i always find fascinating is how people adjust their prejudices. those for criminalizing the buyer say that prostitution is wrong, but then if you point out that every relationship or marriage is prostitution itself, and they will say that it is an acceptable form of prostitution.

People are kind of strange. they decide what is right and wrong to suit their desires. so a woman selling her body for hard cash is wrong, but a woman who gets bought a new pair of louboutins by her boyfriend is in love or whatever( even though its a trade all the same). They cant say prostitution is wrong and say relationships are acceptable. both are the same thing, but one is accepted and one isnt

"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." - William James

You are spending way too much time in the company of the soulless mercenaries that populate this forum, to such an extent that you question whether love exists and try to degrade it to some kind of trade. My sincere advice is to leave this forum. It's why I spent a while on the dr phil forum. I am now permanently barred from the dr phil forum hence my return here.

[SmallHorn]

It's why I spent a while on the dr phil forum. I am now permanently barred from the dr phil forum hence my return here.

Link please?

[Tumbleweed]

Link please?

No, go fuck yourself.

[SmallHorn]

No, go fuck yourself.

No, you go fuck yourself

[tom sand]

No, you go fuck yourself

No, go fuck yourself.

is a hand service considered that of what they call
go fuck yourself

[SmallHorn]

is a hand service considered that of what they call
go fuck yourself

No.

You must be quite flexible and well endowed.


A loose arse hole always helps