Originally Posted by
funlover12
unfortunately its not, cause then there wouldnt be a need for a booklet and months of debate, but if you want to dumb it down go ahead.
I dont vote for the sake of voting, I need to be convinced one way or the other and in this case they have failed to make a solid distinction and there are potentially serious ramifications for a yes vote aparently and given the fact I dont strongly feel one way or the other about it I wont just pick one for the sake of voting. A no is the safest vote in that case, status quo and we can come back to it if there are no holes in the yes campaigns logic and if that is already the case then you have to ask yourself why have television debates on it all if it just mudies the waters. dont blame me, blame the system.
Not sure if trolling or...
Holes or not Democracy means having the right to nit pick decisions like this to your own contentment.
Just...what are you actually saying FL12?
You talk of Future Ramifications. On to what? Can two Gay people get married or not? It's a Yes or No question. There are no ramifications beyond this.
You say if there was no big deal to this why would people need to be given as much information as possible before making a decision that could drastically alter the lives of millions...eh what?
What?
What if "It's Raining Men" and 'Let the bodies hit the floor' are both about the same event but from different perspectives 🤔