Reviews.. what's the point

[zoozoozoo]

I never had a positive review deleted, now why would that be? Do escorts have a 'right of reply' before the reviews are published? Either way I have had a review deleted because the girl in the profile is not the girl in the apartment, no big deal but people should be aware. Otherwise what is the point of reviews?

Escorts can and sometimes do leave comments on reviews , in the past the reviewer could also reply to those comments but at times it was starting to get out of hand , regardless of the actual review / comments the most important part is the questions
Would you recommend ?
Would you see again ?
Check those answers on escorts you plan to visit and take note of reviewers you have most in common with

[jcon1913]

Escorts can and sometimes do leave comments on reviews , in the past the reviewer could also reply to those comments but at times it was starting to get out of hand , regardless of the actual review / comments the most important part is the questions
Would you recommend ?
Would you see again ?
Check those answers on escorts you plan to visit and take note of reviewers you have most in common with

Yes but that still doesnt get over genuine reviews which may be of use to other punters being deleted for no apparent reason.

[Curvaceous Kate]

Yes but that still doesnt get over genuine reviews which may be of use to other punters being deleted for no apparent reason.

It's always difficult when a review is always going to be one sided. If you look at it logically the person writing the review is much less likely to be aware of their own faults, so he won't realise if he is coming across as 'intense', 'unfriendly', 'bossy' etc. He may not be aware if he has bad breath or even if he has a cheesy cock. So this person, who believes himself/herself to be the perfect client writes a review from the perspective of a 'perfect' client, when the reality may not be quite so true.

They may also have had a really crap day or bad experience previously and be bringing that into the room with them. I've had clients that have lost loved ones, split with their partner or lost their job and they don't tend to tell you this until the end when they have finally relaxed a bit and the tension they are holding is released. Match this up with an Escort who has had several time wasters or a client who didn't understand the word no previously and it's not likely to go that well.

You also have the 'after glow effect'. There are some that believe it is not good to write a review straight after a booking. If you have had a good time (which hopefully you have) and hit that climax, for a short period of time afterwards, you will have an elevated view of the booking and anything that may have annoyed/disappointed before becomes irrelevant or forgotten. Some feel that you should leave it 24 hours before writing the review, as at that point you will have a more balanced view. But then do you? Which is most important? The fact that the Escort sent you to that euphoric state, or the fact that she didn't offer you a drink on entry?

Then there is the type of 'client'. Some prefer to find Escorts that they can see regularly, while others are looking for that 'adrenalin filled wow factor' and nothing else will do. Then you have the 'eclectic' client who likes variety and rarely goes for the same type twice. How do you use a review of that type? Would it be about 'standards' or 'performance' or 'desirability'? Especially if he sometimes likes to go 'outside the box' and not for someone he would typically go for.

Basically there are so many variables and that's just talking about the 'real' reviews.

Negative reviews can often be a product of someones disappointment with themselves, with the situation they find themselves in and for their own mistakes in not doing enough research.

Having said all that, I do sympathise with those who have genuinely been caught out by a bait and switch or have had a below par service where there is no mistaking that the client is not wanted, but then if those Escorts never got a review, would that not work in the same way as a negative?

Lastly, if people put so much credence on reviews... how come the Escorts that don't allow them are still working and making money?

[Ridemesideways]

I will admit that the few reviews I have written have been done so as soon as I have got home.

" The fact that the Escort sent you to that euphoric state, or the fact that she didn't offer you a drink on entry?"

Definitely "euphoric state" What else matters!

I would only write a negative review if the amenities offered were so poor as to spoil the whole reason why I was there in the first place.

I would be more inclined to leave out that I not was offered a drink at the door. Anyway if I want a drink I will ask for one or ask the girl to switch off her phone etc.

I know people some will argue that's a bad service, but like I said I'm not there for the amenities.

You are fond of the drink lad, I wouldn't even want a drink, i'm not there for the drink

[hunterhilman]

That is a bit silly. If I get a glowing review from someone who has some N/A or negs, then it shows that they are not just writing the same great review for everyone regardless and actually do put thought into what they are saying, so it makes me look even better.

Not sure why a favourite escort would be upset over someone else getting a negative review?

You're not getting it, some people won't leave bad reviews at all whether negative, neutral or N/A but will only leave the positive.( even in cases where it has not been that good) If you're going to review, review all whether good or bad, that is why they are there afterall

[TiffanyTees]

Here is a perfect example of a guy reading a ladies reviews and still thinks with his dick.

https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html


Tiff xxx

[CANALI]

I think the 'maybe' leaves an element of doubt, so it would have been good for you to have said, that you rarely return, but if you were to, then she is a lady you would be happy to return to.

It might seem long winded or unnecessary to you, but my immediate thought was that despite pulling out all the stops, you were still not satisfied.

I do agree that if you are disappointed due to deception then it is the clients right to say so, but for those that don't review due to the 'non click factor' then I think that is fair enough, as your opinion would be coloured for personal reasons.

Having said that, to give no review is still in it's own way making a point, as you are not lying or recommending falsely, so it really should be up to the individual to decide what they want to do.

I only review when the encounter has been particularly fantastic or particularly bad. Thankfully I have only written one bad review. I have had numerous encounters where things didn't click. These would not warrant a negative review.

[jcon1913]

It's always difficult when a review is always going to be one sided. If you look at it logically the person writing the review is much less likely to be aware of their own faults, so he won't realise if he is coming across as 'intense', 'unfriendly', 'bossy' etc. He may not be aware if he has bad breath or even if he has a cheesy cock. So this person, who believes himself/herself to be the perfect client writes a review from the perspective of a 'perfect' client, when the reality may not be quite so true.

They may also have had a really crap day or bad experience previously and be bringing that into the room with them. I've had clients that have lost loved ones, split with their partner or lost their job and they don't tend to tell you this until the end when they have finally relaxed a bit and the tension they are holding is released. Match this up with an Escort who has had several time wasters or a client who didn't understand the word no previously and it's not likely to go that well.

You also have the 'after glow effect'. There are some that believe it is not good to write a review straight after a booking. If you have had a good time (which hopefully you have) and hit that climax, for a short period of time afterwards, you will have an elevated view of the booking and anything that may have annoyed/disappointed before becomes irrelevant or forgotten. Some feel that you should leave it 24 hours before writing the review, as at that point you will have a more balanced view. But then do you? Which is most important? The fact that the Escort sent you to that euphoric state, or the fact that she didn't offer you a drink on entry?

Then there is the type of 'client'. Some prefer to find Escorts that they can see regularly, while others are looking for that 'adrenalin filled wow factor' and nothing else will do. Then you have the 'eclectic' client who likes variety and rarely goes for the same type twice. How do you use a review of that type? Would it be about 'standards' or 'performance' or 'desirability'? Especially if he sometimes likes to go 'outside the box' and not for someone he would typically go for.

Basically there are so many variables and that's just talking about the 'real' reviews.

Negative reviews can often be a product of someones disappointment with themselves, with the situation they find themselves in and for their own mistakes in not doing enough research.

Having said all that, I do sympathise with those who have genuinely been caught out by a bait and switch or have had a below par service where there is no mistaking that the client is not wanted, but then if those Escorts never got a review, would that not work in the same way as a negative?

Lastly, if people put so much credence on reviews... how come the Escorts that don't allow them are still working and making money?

Many good points there, and I don't write many reviews full stop.

To pick up on a few points, if there was no ''spark'' between me and a girl, well that's not part of the deal, as far as I'm concerned the ''spark'' is a welcome extra, nobody's fault either way if it doesn't happen.

I rarely go to someone who doesn't allow reviews for some of the reasons you have pointed out.

I have met girls who were not the person in the escort profile. Not a problem - but if I can't put in a review stating that then... that's a problem.

I know what you mean about different guys etc. and really we don't know what sort of day / week / year another person has had, so if someone if silent throughout an appointment it is disappointing but it's no excuse for a negative review - they're just trying to get through their day just like me.

[ZVN60]

I've reviewed the vast majority of escorts I've visited. Most of them have been (at worst) fine, and (at best) stunning.

There has been a few I have not been happy with for a variety of reasons (attitude, location, hygiene). I haven't reviewed them for the following reasons:

Attitude - person could have been having a bad day, we simply didn't click.
Location - not ideal for me but could be for somebody else.
Hygiene - this was only one person who was very friendly so didn't really deserve a bad review.

I've only left one bad review, and the person deserved it. I've reviewed a few whose photos didn't match up with their physical appearance, and they were obviously not published. I understand that I am within my rights to walk away if that is the case, but I do think it needs to be made clearer to others if an escort is deliberately using photos that aren't themselves. The "EI Not Verified" tagline isn't enough.

I can see why people would be suspicious looking at someone's review history and noticed there were no negative reviews. But there are a few mitigating factors.

[jcon1913]

I've reviewed the vast majority of escorts I've visited. Most of them have been (at worst) fine, and (at best) stunning.

There has been a few I have not been happy with for a variety of reasons (attitude, location, hygiene). I haven't reviewed them for the following reasons:

Attitude - person could have been having a bad day, we simply didn't click.
Location - not ideal for me but could be for somebody else.
Hygiene - this was only one person who was very friendly so didn't really deserve a bad review.

I've only left one bad review, and the person deserved it. I've reviewed a few whose photos didn't match up with their physical appearance, and they were obviously not published. I understand that I am within my rights to walk away if that is the case, but I do think it needs to be made clearer to others if an escort is deliberately using photos that aren't themselves. The "EI Not Verified" tagline isn't enough.

I can see why people would be suspicious looking at someone's review history and noticed there were no negative reviews. But there are a few mitigating factors.

The point of fake photos being mentioned in a review is usually there is travel involved in getting to where the escort is staying, and arrangements have to made in the case of those of us who have families, jobs etc etc. So there is a time factor. I have met a few girls who clearly were not the girl in the profile. Usually not a problem but its annoying is all, and if other people know that it was going on then they might not visit that girl.