Anarchy vs Authoritania(government)

[ana massage]

Wich one are you and why?

[SmallHorn]

I live by my owns rules mostly.


"The Smallhorn Code"

[ana massage]

I live by my owns rules mostly.


"The Smallhorn Code"

What rules are those?

I thank your post only couse you said i have a nice bottom

[Phoenixdays]

You say people could organise to protect themselves
Well gangs and warlords would also organise to rob kill or enslave you
Also people organising-you are back to a type of government.
If you want to see anarchy and weak government look at places like Libya orSomalia.
Neither do we want authoritarianism Hitler Polpot Stalin and plenty in the modern world
Both anarchy and authoritarianism would interfere intolerably in the lives of ordinary people
We want neither but instead a happy medium in between and in a lot of Europe we are close to it at the moment.
Try being poor in Africa Asia or S.America
And lok to the past to see the disasters that both anarchy and authoritarianism have brought.

[ana massage]

You say people could organise to protect themselves
Well gangs and warlords would also organise to rob kill or enslave you
Also people organising-you are back to a type of government.
If you want to see anarchy and weak government look at places like Libya orSomalia.
Neither do we want authoritarianism Hitler Polpot Stalin and plenty in the modern world
Both anarchy and authoritarianism would interfere intolerably in the lives of ordinary people
We want neither but instead a happy medium in between and in a lot of Europe we are close to it at the moment.
Try being poor in Africa Asia or S.America
And lok to the past to see the disasters that both anarchy and authoritarianism have brought.

yes gangs and warlords can organise to rob,kill and enslave you(wich already hapens but the gangs name is government) but you can defend yourself=the majority(and i repeat myself defending yourself now is a crime).
weak goverments brings the worst in people.they corrupt/force people to make people show the worst of them.
Anarchy=no one is your master,no one is your slave

[samlad]

yes gangs and warlords can organise to rob,kill and enslave you(wich already hapens but the gangs name is government) but you can defend yourself=the majority(and i repeat myself defending yourself now is a crime).
weak goverments brings the worst in people.they corrupt/force people to make people show the worst of them.
Anarchy=no one is your master,no one is your slave

Gangs and warlords are not the government; you can't really compare a Colombian drug lord to Stormont, alebit the DUP are a bunch of backward thinking bigots. Excessive self-defense is a crime, but defending yourself isn't a crime. There are corrupt governments in the world, as with anything in life, and over centuries, kingdoms have fought and attempted to over-rule, but still, a community even under these circumstances always end up having to implement rules and order to stop people doing what they want and decimating everything.

You can't have it both ways. Organised chaos is an oxymoron.

[Prickly]

Wich one are you and why?

Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.

[warmcome]

Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.

if we want to avoid a mess, we avoid anarchy. (not sayin 'democracy' has it's issues either.)

[samlad]

Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.

But without government, law and order, a lot more people would invade your personal life, for example, someone could just kick your door in and walk off with your TV. You split their skull for trying it, you'll have a gang around your door riddling you with bullets. I do believe that there is a precarious line between protection and control, but anarchy would tilt the scale and it would just be survival of the fittest. In essence, the nation would then revert back to natural selection.

[ana massage]

But without government, law and order, a lot more people would invade your personal life, for example, someone could just kick your door in and walk off with your TV. You split their skull for trying it, you'll have a gang around your door riddling you with bullets. I do believe that there is a precarious line between protection and control, but anarchy would tilt the scale and it would just be survival of the fittest. In essence, the nation would then revert back to natural selection.

"Invading people personal life"=taxing,invading and controlling people etc.
Hmm ,I wonder wich one I would choose
Your example is silly and also does not surprise me
I stand for the choice of being able to defend yourself,the same one that this days it is forbidden by the government.
Anarch also means for all of us to stand ,work,communicate together.


Ps:I hope I understood your post right