Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Anarchy vs Authoritania(government)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,645
    Blog Entries
    3

    Question Anarchy vs Authoritania(government)

    Wich one are you and why?

    Retiring for good soon
    Check out My Website
    www.theartofsofttouch.com

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ana massage For This Useful Post:

    SmallHorn (20-01-15)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,424
    Reviews
    51

    Default

    I live by my owns rules mostly.


    "The Smallhorn Code"
    Last edited by SmallHorn; 20-01-15 at 16:53. Reason: Ps: Ana has a very nice bottom

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to SmallHorn For This Useful Post:

    ana massage (20-01-15)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    I'm at the landmark - where are you?
    Posts
    1,219
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ana massage View Post
    Wich one are you and why?

    Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Prickly For This Useful Post:

    warmcome (20-01-15)

  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,713
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prickly View Post
    Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.
    if we want to avoid a mess, we avoid anarchy. (not sayin 'democracy' has it's issues either.)
    Last edited by warmcome; 20-01-15 at 16:58.

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prickly View Post
    Anarchy. Because central government always messes things up and has no right to interfere in peoples personal lives.
    But without government, law and order, a lot more people would invade your personal life, for example, someone could just kick your door in and walk off with your TV. You split their skull for trying it, you'll have a gang around your door riddling you with bullets. I do believe that there is a precarious line between protection and control, but anarchy would tilt the scale and it would just be survival of the fittest. In essence, the nation would then revert back to natural selection.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    SmallHorn (20-01-15), willie wacker (21-01-15)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,645
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    But without government, law and order, a lot more people would invade your personal life, for example, someone could just kick your door in and walk off with your TV. You split their skull for trying it, you'll have a gang around your door riddling you with bullets. I do believe that there is a precarious line between protection and control, but anarchy would tilt the scale and it would just be survival of the fittest. In essence, the nation would then revert back to natural selection.
    "Invading people personal life"=taxing,invading and controlling people etc.
    Hmm ,I wonder wich one I would choose
    Your example is silly and also does not surprise me
    I stand for the choice of being able to defend yourself,the same one that this days it is forbidden by the government.
    Anarch also means for all of us to stand ,work,communicate together.


    Ps:I hope I understood your post right
    Retiring for good soon
    Check out My Website
    www.theartofsofttouch.com

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ana massage View Post
    "Invading people personal life"=taxing,invading and controlling people etc.
    Hmm ,I wonder wich one I would choose
    Your example is silly and also does not surprise me
    I stand for the choice of being able to defend yourself,the same one that this days it is forbidden by the government.
    Anarch also means for all of us to stand ,work,communicate together.


    Ps:I hope I understood your post right
    I don't know why my example is silly? If you want a better example, without tax, there would be no emergency services, amenities, banks, sanitation, businesses, legitimate trade, etc.. It would be everyone for themselves. No democracy, so people will take law into their own hands. You would be surprised at how fragile our state of mind is, because once all that goes out of the window, you are left with fending for yourself, and the illusion of civilisation as we know that protects us would no longer protect us, and we would really see what people are like when they start looting our homes and killing each other.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    SmallHorn (20-01-15)

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,645
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    I don't know why my example is silly? If you want a better example, without tax, there would be no emergency services, amenities, banks, sanitation, businesses, legitimate trade, etc.. It would be everyone for themselves. No democracy, so people will take law into their own hands. You would be surprised at how fragile our state of mind is, because once all that goes out of the window, you are left with fending for yourself, and the illusion of civilisation as we know that protects us would no longer protect us, and we would really see what people are like when they start looting our homes and killing each other.
    Emergency services,businesses etc=are made by the people and not the government.
    banks=how does banks help me?why do i need them?(i have lived without banks all my life)
    Are you saying that without the government ,there won't be anymore of all this?why?i don't get it

    So the way I see it is :
    1: YES to emergency services couse there would still be doctor,telephonists,ambulance drivers etc .All of those are made of real people and not even one of them is from the government
    2:Yes to business because everyone can participate voluntarily and with organization and cooperation ,of course same all in exchange of money.(without paying taxes to the government for our work)

    ''It would be everyone for themselves'' wrong wrong .sorry but I do not agree
    As for defending,take law into their own hands......: First of all we won't loose anymore the right to defend ourself from violence or to defend what we have from those who would take it.We can organise and cooperate together to exercise that right.organising for mutual defence does not need the government.as nobody wants to be robbed and all of us want to feel safe,we can defend ourself or hire others to do it on our behalf,right?
    Do you feel more safe having the government?but still very bad things are still hapening,wars are still happening,guns are all over the streets because governments allow it.
    This days self defence is called a ''crime''
    A well armed population can defend and respond in front of those small gangs( bad people that want to take you tv away) that actually represent the minority.
    the majority of population can live civilised ,don't you think?
    Besides the moral ''laws'' i do not find any other law helpful for me or others .
    Retiring for good soon
    Check out My Website
    www.theartofsofttouch.com

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,645
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmallHorn View Post
    I live by my owns rules mostly.


    "The Smallhorn Code"
    What rules are those?

    I thank your post only couse you said i have a nice bottom
    Retiring for good soon
    Check out My Website
    www.theartofsofttouch.com

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ana massage View Post
    Emergency services,businesses etc=are made by the people and not the government.
    banks=how does banks help me?why do i need them?(i have lived without banks all my life)
    Are you saying that without the government ,there won't be anymore of all this?why?i don't get it

    So the way I see it is :
    1: YES to emergency services couse there would still be doctor,telephonists,ambulance drivers etc .All of those are made of real people and not even one of them is from the government
    2:Yes to business because everyone can participate voluntarily and with organization and cooperation ,of course same all in exchange of money.(without paying taxes to the government for our work)

    ''It would be everyone for themselves'' wrong wrong .sorry but I do not agree
    As for defending,take law into their own hands......: First of all we won't loose anymore the right to defend ourself from violence or to defend what we have from those who would take it.We can organise and cooperate together to exercise that right.organising for mutual defence does not need the government.as nobody wants to be robbed and all of us want to feel safe,we can defend ourself or hire others to do it on our behalf,right?
    Do you feel more safe having the government?but still very bad things are still hapening,wars are still happening,guns are all over the streets because governments allow it.
    This days self defence is called a ''crime''
    A well armed population can defend and respond in front of those small gangs( bad people that want to take you tv away) that actually represent the minority.
    the majority of population can live civilised ,don't you think?
    Besides the moral ''laws'' i do not find any other law helpful for me or others .
    You are an idealist, not a realist, clearly.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    ana massage (20-01-15)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •