Originally Posted by
Meursault
I would agree with that except she accused both men of raping her. One was found not guilty and while the other was not.
That is why there is a big media debate. Two men are accused. One is found not guilty, the other is. Given the circumstances and every case differs on circumstances, it is obvious there is inconsistencies.
I am not schooled in law, but i think the judge should have instructed (if possible) to find them both guilty or both not guilty. Or else she should only have accused ched evans. the fact that she accuses them both of the same crime and one is let go and the other isnt, doesnt make sense and hence why the big debate.
This is being debated on forums across the Uk and Ireland for this reason. If they had both being found guilty we would not be discussing it.
Thats the inconsistency.