That's probably correct.
But: the Westminster parliament voted years ago to abolish capital punishment, and it has remained abolished even though opinion polls show that many people would like it back.
Likewise, Westminster voted to permit abortion in defined circumstances—though this never applied to N Ireland. There's still many people who oppose abortion in any form in the UK.
In both these examples, the parliament was ahead of the general population at the time, so it's possible for legislators to act in (social policy) ways that the general public doesn't agree with.
In N Ireland we have Assembly by theocracy, where belief is more important than facts. Already, there are complaints from someone on the Justice committee that as Dr Huschke disagreed with the committee when she appeared before them, she's clearly biased. It's not only to them that the report doesn't uphold their beliefs, of course; or that any of her views might be informed by previous research. And that the report was complied by a committee rather than an individual is entirely overlooked: the report doesn't include any personal views that the researchers or compliers might have.
Jiberjabber (18-10-14)
Form where, any comments Ive been seeing, people have been calling the Swedish model stupid system, only thje government seems pro... journal boards other articles, comments are against Swedish model.
Give the Irish some credit we are all not idiots if anything the abortion debate is more 50/50 than this more and more comments are against the Swedish model
The older vote of course will be against, but even my own mother came out with legalise it it be safer and she I'm her 60s
The topic spoken on via Facebook etc many medians many different groups End of the day its all nice to care about us tragic women, but when Garda station are close, older people robbed in rural areas, will older vote vote for the huge Garda resources this law will take.
Plus if passed can you see the extra Garda recuirted to tackle this, to any worth while degree?
The DUP had preempted the study as soon as it was released at midnight, claiming it is 'flawed' research. 'Flawed', or contrary to your 'research', Lord Morrow, Paul Givan and Jim Wells?
It will certainly be introduced.
She should never have got such an important position as Justice Minister as she has a record of incompetence and poor decision making.
Unfortunately I believe its only a matter of time.
If it's introduced in Southern Ireland first then this puts even more pressure on Northern Ireland to introduce it as well.
General opinion is that Lord Morrow's bill will go through in the North.
It is opposed by the Official Unionists and the Alliance Party, so the DUP requires Sinn Fein’s support.
It looks like they will get Sinn Fein’s support.
Sinn Fein looks eager to be seen in the North as supporting Roman Catholic Doctrine on sex, especially since they have been forced to take a pro-choice stance on abortion to avoid alienating their left wing Southern voters.
Voting for Lord Morrow's bill will help to placate some of their right-wing members in the North.
Rachel Divine (18-10-14)