Changes This Weekend

[annasavicha]

But it should recognise that the field is filled and accept the number.

Probably it tought i should charge more

[Patricia]

Wooohooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It works!!!!!!!!!!

Patty have magic hands!!!!!!!!probably more than that

Thanks


before it kept requesting to fill 'all fields' in meaning it did not accepted my 130 i tried to fill in

Great, well I hope it is all fixed now, but please let me know if you have any further problems, as the only way we'll find and eliminate any problems there may be is if ladies tell us when there is a problem.

[annasavicha]

Jajaaaaa.....that s why i brought it up.
Thanks for looking into it,especially on sunday when everyone else is off

[thehighwayman]

Good to see some useful changes to the site. Keep them coming.

[Patricia]

Good to see some useful changes to the site. Keep them coming.

Thanks... The best is yet to come though... Or at least the one that has taken the most work is still yet to come... My whip is being cracked hard in E-I's office tonight x

[Stewie]

Just a suggestion

The price ranges at the moment lump everyone over 125 in together

So girls like Annasavicha who are charging 130 which is a great price are lumped in with girls charging 150 which is pretty much the standard rate

If it is to be any benefit to the women making an effort on prices it has to distinguish 130 from 150

Can I suggest that 140 be the top price in this section.

So it would be 100
101 -120
121 - 140

that way girls charging below the standard 150 get some benefit


Personally i wouldn't be bothered going through the hundred odd girls in the 125- 150 range looking for the 130 - 140 girls

[annasavicha]

Just a suggestion

The price ranges at the moment lump everyone over 125 in together

So girls like Annasavicha who are charging 130 which is a great price are lumped in with girls charging 150 which is pretty much the standard rate

If it is to be any benefit to the women making an effort on prices it has to distinguish 130 from 150

Can I suggest that 140 be the top price in this section.

So it would be 100
101 -120
121 - 140

that way girls charging below the standard 150 get some benefit


Personally i wouldn't be bothered going through the hundred odd girls in the 125- 150 range looking for the 130 - 140 girls

I tought the same,as there are many girls charging 130

[Patricia]

Just a suggestion

The price ranges at the moment lump everyone over 125 in together

So girls like Annasavicha who are charging 130 which is a great price are lumped in with girls charging 150 which is pretty much the standard rate

If it is to be any benefit to the women making an effort on prices it has to distinguish 130 from 150

Can I suggest that 140 be the top price in this section.

So it would be 100
101 -120
121 - 140

that way girls charging below the standard 150 get some benefit


Personally i wouldn't be bothered going through the hundred odd girls in the 125- 150 range looking for the 130 - 140 girls

Ok, you're about the 3rd person to basically say this already tonight, so you're wish is my command. We'll change it to as per your suggestion now. We can still change it a further time if further feedback suggests an even better option.

[dreamon]

There are some hopeful signs in this, in that some kind of reasonable market is developing. Most of the escorts in the lowest price range are in what I call the "certifiably fake" category whereas most of the best escorts are able to hold their prices. You cannot expect anyone to give their best unless they are properly rewarded for it. I just do not understand guys who would prefer 3 crappy experiences rather than 2 memorable ones and there are some unforgettable dames out there at the moment
Can the price range be added to the search engine as it would help in sorting the wheat from the chaff.

[Cable87]

Hi Patricia!


So these are some of the changes you mentioned when I PM'd you a few weeks ago... they all sound really good! Letting the ladies change their rates as they see fit and change their messages and pics (subject to moderator approval) are also something that I think will work well, and the cases of abuse will hopefully be few in number. The measures you hope to put in place regarding possible abuses should also work well, should you actually need to impliment them.

I also think that letting the ladies change their favourites is a good idea, and the measure you hope to take regarding the posting of favourites that aren't provided (by removing them from their profiles) should hopefully cause no hassles for you or anyone else. Also, the 'Ridin out the Recession' section is a great idea! The listings of ladies offering lower rates will no doubt save time (and of course money!) for the punter, and will hopefully also increase business for the ladies offering these lower rates.

If I might add to the discussion by making a suggestion-- one that will hopefully even further refine the site and add to your endeavors to improve the use, accuracy, and overall functionality of the site--


The thing that I'm thinking of is not just about services that are/aren't provided; your intention to remove any favourites that aren't actually provided upon hearing about them via reviews or other messages will hopefully cut way back on the practice. But what I'm thinking about is what I will characterise, perhaps not without knowing that it may be difficult to pin down, as 'HIDDEN COSTS'. For example:


Some ladies provide certain services for extra money. Things like OWO, CIM, Facials, Anal, and sometimes GFE/'French Kissing' come to mind, and there are no doubt others as well. It is, of course, each ladies right to charge extra money for these or any other 'extra' services if they choose to-- I would never say that it isn't-- but if one of the general aims of these improvements is to enhance communication and the accuracy of the site and the advertisements of the services provided, then I would suggest that it also become necessary that any additional costs for those extras be specified in the profile. I know there are many ladies that don't really have any 'hidden costs', and some have even gone out of their way to make sure we punters know it's 'all-inclusive' and that's very nice of them, but many others don't. It can be really annoying as a punter to make a booking, arrive there, discuss 'business' (or perhaps get right 'down to business'), only to be told AFTER you're already in the door, and sometimes already undressed and 'into it', that a certain service is extra. I know I'm not the only punter to be bothered by this; an un-countable number of reviews I've read on this site make mention of things like this going on.

I know that some would respond to this issue by advising that you discuss ALL of these things BEFORE arriving, usually when making initial contact-- just ask if something is/isn't included in the price advertised on the site-- but this can be WIDE OPEN to abuse and misunderstandings, and I've read more than 1 review where the punter mentions that he specifically asked if a service was provided/costs extra over the phone, only to find out once he's there that it's NOT provided or costs extra. This is the classic 'hook' that extracts untold amounts of extra money from guys wallets in Amsterdam; some of the girls there tell you it's a 50 Euro for a 15-20 minute 'suck-n-fuck'-- you go inside, get undressed, and then-- "you want to touch my breasts? 20 Euro extra". "You want more postions that just missionary? 20 Euro extra". This IS NOT Amsterdam, and ALL additional cost which could be 'hidden' or characterised that way should be made known to the (potential) punter IN Escort profiles. I'd be afraid that some escorts would try to capitalise on this as a hidden way to still end-up with the same money in the end; charging 130 for 30 minutes, then an additional 20 for OWO-- that would kind of negate the purpose of having a 'Ridin out the Recession' discount, at least for the punters! So, on the list of 'favourites', next to any favourite that would have an additional cost, there should be an indicator (perhaps listed inside brackets) next to it to let it be known that it costs extra. For example:

OWO (20-50 extra), CIM (20-50 extra) Facial (20-50 extra).

Or perhaps it could be without the listing of how much extra it costs, but AT LEAST an indicator that it IS extra!


Just a long-winded suggestion that would help clear-up problems and mis-understandings-- I hope you think about them!


All hail, the Queen of Tarts!!

Cable87