Originally Posted by JAMESCORK
Believe me, in this case its true.
She is a good friend of Hunny Bunny (Vanessa). Started off this game a few years ago. Naïve, not quite knowing all the GFE and service bit... got a few disappointed customers and a few dodgy reviews. Not surprisingly business suffered, so we opt out. Biz picked up again and we thought.... Hey, reviews are not the be all and end all.... She is now a very good escort but has to bear the cross of those bad reviews.... I haven't availed of her services, but know those that have. I believe she offers a very good service, looks exactly as per pics and is a lasher too...
While I'm all in favour of escorts being helped in this demanding industry and I think James' motives are good in this instance, I'm not sure this is fair to other escorts who have been forced to opt out too - for whatever reasons. And James, hearsay - or being 'Hunny Bunny's' flatmate - is not grounds enough for a valid opinion. I've been slated before for saying this but if you haven't visited an escort, then touting is just plain silly. For the record I have visited with Monica and was unable to leave a review.
James makes an interesting point about historical reviews. Is there a period of time after which an escort can have her reviews removed? I know most of Rachel's have recently been removed (to my certain knowledge they were all excellent) and I wonder could an escort who had a few early mishaps have those early reviews deleted? Maybe earn a reprieve after a specified length of time?
It's an interesting issue in a wider societal context too because an early legal misdemeanour can remain on a person's record. I know of some who've struggled many years later to qualify for travel Visas because of a minor teenage infraction.
Reply With Quote