Escort Photos - what works best - How important is the quality versus reality

[PaddyDaddy]

I dont care if the photo is amateur, semi-pro or pro just as long as its has no photoshop, then Im happy. Or at the very least dont make the PS glaringly obvious! Some PS'd pictures are a right turn off IMO.

The more natural I sense the woman to be in her pictures the more excited I get about the prospect of potentially meeting her. I refer to this personally as the butterfly effect.

[BelfastGeeza]

There is absolutely no way that these pro photogs aren't using Photoshop, they are, it's so so unlikely that everything is achieved on the camera. Photoshop is used, but it is used effectively and more importantly subtly.

[stringfurtcool]

I've been using all sorts of pictures in my 4 years around Ireland: homemade, 700£+, and now pro but 0% photoshop. My own experience: same type of clients, some of them wealthier and classy, others not, a lot of variety for me, most of them under 40yo, but you know what, eventually they all pay the same amount for my time. And it makes no difference the pictures as long as,most of the times, the reviews are "talking" .. My two cents

Its good to see that Good honest Escorts are in the majority and only one or two are prejudice.

[Larissa Laurentis]

So there are those photos that are taken professionally in a studio at great expense, then those that are maybe less professional done via an iPhone or compact camera.
So with photo's done professionally are you more likely to see someone or is it the wording on the profile that gets you interested. So question is when you see the profile for the first time , what is it that makes you pick up the phone and make that appointment? For me it's not just about professional photos.

hi sweetie
This is an interesting thread!!!
For me, there's nothing catches the attention more than well taken professional photos.. without any Photoshop!
It's always nice to hear a client remark that I look exactly as in my profile pictures..
To build a good reputation, surely it's most important to show yourself as you really are and not give anyone an unpleasant surprise in meeting a girl who is very different to what she has shown on her profile!
I'm also a fan of natural photos and have had some taken spontaneously ! I must say was very pleased with how they turned out and how pleased the gents here were with them..
Really the important thing is being honest in how I show myself.. yes, hair, make up, how I dress etc is very important for me and I always try my best to be perfect for every date!!
But I don't think it makes me better than the next girl and I don't think makes for a "better" client base..
After all, there are lovely clients out there that come from all walks of life

best wishes to all

xxx

[topgun]

Its interesting to see such diverse opinions between the girls yet the guys seem to be saying the opposite. In some cases the expense of 'pro' photos gives good pay back in terms of the 'type' of clientele. All seem to agree that as long as the pictures match the reality then that's the biggy and that photoshop is kept minimal.
For me so long as the photo is clear (and its all about lighting really) then it doesn't matter. A lot of the 'guys' seem to prefer the 'natural look', as do I. I'm not sure that a 1000euro set of photos v those non-pro ones , providing they are well 'exposed' (no pun intended) and well dressed, made up , really is worth that level of investment. Interesting replies though - thanks.

[funlover12]

Id much rather have a beauty dressed in trash, than trash dressed in beauty

[bettercallsaul]

I am not very shallow as long as the lady has a superb body,great reviews from names i trust and nice face and her favourite list includes what i like that is all i care about.


i might have lied about the shallow bit

shallow saul.

[annabel taylor]

i'm not ridiculously wealthy but my money has the same value as anybody else's plus i probably have better manners than some of those rich kids.
money dosen' make you a better person.

just a better client

[Rachel Divine]

Its interesting to see such diverse opinions between the girls yet the guys seem to be saying the opposite. In some cases the expense of 'pro' photos gives good pay back in terms of the 'type' of clientele. All seem to agree that as long as the pictures match the reality then that's the biggy and that photoshop is kept minimal.
For me so long as the photo is clear (and its all about lighting really) then it doesn't matter. A lot of the 'guys' seem to prefer the 'natural look', as do I. I'm not sure that a 1000euro set of photos v those non-pro ones , providing they are well 'exposed' (no pun intended) and well dressed, made up , really is worth that level of investment. Interesting replies though - thanks.

Matters .

Own experience.

[Rachel Divine]

I would be more of the opinion that so long as they pay me the agreed fee, are clean, and respectful towards me then I dont really care what walk of life they are from ,, Milk in texcos cost the same amount with their money as it does with the better walk of life clients money.

I certainly have different attitude than you do and def I would not compare myself/my services with " milk in tescos".