Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: UN women's note on sex work, sexual exploitation, and trafficking

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,796

    Default UN women's note on sex work, sexual exploitation, and trafficking

    UN women's note on sex work, sexual exploitation, and trafficking

    Quote Originally Posted by Global Network of Sex Work Projects
    In this resource, UN Women respond to the anti-decriminalisation campaign by Equality Now. UN Women reaffirm that sex work is work, and that sex workers need the rights that come with full decriminalisation. They highlight and condemn attempts to conflate sex work with sexual exploitation and trafficking. They note that conflating these very different concepts leads to human rights abuses towards both sex workers and trafficked people.

    They particularly highlight:

    • The issues of sex work, sexual exploitation and trafficking are complex issues which have significant legal, social and health consequences. Due to such complexity, it is important that we do not conflate these three issues which deserve to be considered in their own right. We cannot consider sex work the same way we consider trafficking or sexual exploitation which are human rights abuses and crimes.
    • The conflation of consensual sex work and sex trafficking leads to inappropriate responses that fail to assist sex workers and victims of trafficking in realizing their rights. Furthermore, failing to distinguish between these groups infringes on sex workers’ right to health and self- determination and can impede efforts to prevent and prosecute trafficking.
    • Sex workers are right holders like all other women and men and should be recognized as such.
    You can read more and download the resource from here.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Lara Mills For This Useful Post:

    Jack in the Box (22-10-13), ManHold (19-10-13), Morpheus (19-10-13), the traveller (19-10-13), zoozoozoo (19-10-13)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    2,400
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    Well Posted!

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    603
    Reviews
    19

    Default

    And that is exactly what all the independent researchers said at the J.O.(C)ke hearings.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to the traveller For This Useful Post:

    Jack in the Box (22-10-13), Morpheus (19-10-13)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,753
    Reviews
    31

    Default

    Thanks for posting Lara.

    But sure what would the U.N know? In comparison to real unbiased experts like Ruhama, the Immigrant council and the rest of the TORL????
    "Don't be reckless with other people’s hearts. Don't put up with people who are reckless with yours"

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Morpheus For This Useful Post:

    Jack in the Box (22-10-13)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,682
    Reviews
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morpheus View Post
    Thanks for posting Lara.

    But sure what would the U.N know? In comparison to real unbiased experts like Ruhama, the Immigrant council and the rest of the TORL????
    Didn't Rachel Moran get all upset about the UN a few months ago

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to dob For This Useful Post:

    Jack in the Box (22-10-13)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •