Quote Originally Posted by chatman View Post
of course it would work,the mobile pic would go to e.i of the escort on condition that its for verifaction only and not to be printed unless the escort gives permission this is because some escorts dont want there faces seen, the picture can then be verified against pics sent in by escort to e.i that they want put on site, afterall escorts are sending in pics to e.i so why cant they send in on a monthly basis mobile pics of themselves and if they refuse to do this put them on a unverified site so when i click on to e.i i can go to which site i want [ verified or unverified site or both ] the pics would have to be full lenght so e.i can see that stats are close to being factual as well,also if i visit an escort and i send in a review saying its not the girl in pics on site e. i could ring escort and state that unless a mobile pics of her in area she says she is in isnt received within 12 hours her pics would be moved to unverified site, this would also stop people sending in false reviews saying its not the girl in pics when it is , this new site structure would bring more punters as people are leaving or not joining as they feel they cant trust verifacation process
It is already possible for an escort to send a picture of herself for verification purposes to E-I by email with the proviso, that it will not be used in the advert. I suspect that this has been done on an ad-hoc basis only where there was a question concerning the veracity of an escort's pictures. I don't know what resources would be required to make this a standard feature of photo verification. Perhaps Patricia would like to comment on this.