Originally Posted by
Magicman
There are other obvious solutions.
(1) A punter should be a member for at least three months before he is allowed to review.
(2) The first five reviews should all carry a "not verified" warning.
(3) Reviews should be subject to some scrutiny somewhere along the line and those that are suspect should be dealt with by seeking clarification from the reviewer via a private message or email from administration.
(4) No reviewer should be allowed to review the same girl over and over again. Once should be enough unless the reviewer has changed from either a positive to a negative or vice versa. Some reviewers with upwards of fifty reviews only saw about twenty girls in total.
(5) All reviews should be posted within one week of the appointment. Some people are posting three, four and even more reviews in one day, thus ensuring that their tally of reviews are getting higher giving them more standing and credibility in the eyes of adminstation.
(6) The "I smell a rat" situtation is a farce..............either a review is genuine or not. If suspected, not to be a genuine review, it should be removed.
(7) Any escort submitting a fake review either of herself or another escort should not be allowed access to the site other that to her own advert.
(8) Any punter submitting fake reviews for any reason should be banned from submitting reviews.
If all or even some of these ideas were taken on board then the review system might begin to have some real meaning. These measures would require very little extra work to administer..........probably less than it takes to currently weed out the fake reviews.
Cheers,
Magicman.