But this issue has been talked about before (we've even had polls on it) and the answer has always come back that, even if it is decided a review is fake, it should not be deleted.
But this issue has been talked about before (we've even had polls on it) and the answer has always come back that, even if it is decided a review is fake, it should not be deleted.
Is it not different in this case no? I mean if she is getting call asking if she does bareback? What about that guy in Waterford who forced bareback on a girl and ended up in court? Bit late at that stage for the girl.
The bareback issue is very divisive and is sure to attract the weirdos. I think she can do without that to be honest.
Have you written your reviews?
I think now we have made it clear on the review that she doesn't do bareback, that should deter arseholes who want bareback. However, I think it would have been better if the staff member of ours who approved the review in the first place noticed the bareback allegation and checked with Gemma innmediately, as I can see how unchallenged it could cause her probs with undesirables.
Come on Pat, delete it ..... in all fairness. This is not 'she charged for a favourite' or 'the towels were dirty' .... its a whole other area to be honest. This review if far more misleading to a punter and it doesn't matter how you highlight the fact she doesn't offer it, weirdos will just see that and nothing else.
Delete it ..... it makes sense. I'm sure no punters would say a word if you did.
Have you written your reviews?
Now, I've never asked you for anything, but I'm going to ask that you take down this review. No one should have that on their review, especially when it's false. It's bad for her business.