'Very Unattractive'

[samlad]

Okay, I'm curious; most negative reviews that come in always have the the outcome for the escort's appearance as 'Very Unattractive', as well as the rest of the fields being selected as the worst end of the options spectrum (of course, every location is awful when it is a bad punt, right?).

So, this leads me to believe that it is one of two things:

i) If the escort is that unattractive, why go through with the booking then complain about it?
ii) The escort wasn't actually unattractive, this option was just selected out of spite.

Some people may argue that "because she has a horrible personality, I found her ugly". That doesn't make sense, because we ask for her actual 'physical appearance', not the semantics of her character and how she is perceptually portrayed as a result of it.

Call me sceptical, but this is pretty much sleeping with the enemy, is it not?

[nibb]

With me its personality . and attitude the few negativs. I have are all. to do with attitude. but I often wonder bout reviews . some are not what you expect when you get there but I nearly always have good time . And I wouldnt write anything out of spite .

[Lucy Chambers]

Okay, I'm curious; most negative reviews that come in always have the the outcome for the escort's appearance as 'Very Unattractive', as well as the rest of the fields being selected as the worst end of the options spectrum (of course, every location is awful when it is a bad punt, right?).

So, this leads me to believe that it is one of two things:

i) If the escort is that unattractive, why go through with the booking then complain about it?
ii) The escort wasn't actually unattractive, this option was just selected out of spite.

Some people may argue that "because she has a horrible personality, I found her ugly". That doesn't make sense, because we ask for her actual 'physical appearance', not the semantics of her character and how she is perceptually portrayed as a result of it.

Call me sceptical, but this is pretty much sleeping with the enemy, is it not?

Spiteful, isn't it? I have often wondered what point that section of a review serves as attractiveness is so subjective.

[samlad]

With me its personality . and attitude the few negativs. I have are all. to do with attitude. but I often wonder bout reviews . some are not what you expect when you get there but I nearly always have good time . And I wouldnt write anything out of spite .

I do think that the fields 'How Satisfied were You with the Escort Service you Received?' and 'How Satisfied were You with this Escort Experience Overall?' would cover the attitude, and personally, I don't think that putting down the escort's actual physical appearance is relevant to her personality, as I do know some attractive women that are complete bitches but they are still attractive nonetheless. Obviously it's all down to interpretation, but as I made a point earlier, would a bad service suddenly make a luxury apartment a shit-hole too?

[samlad]

Spiteful, isn't it? I have often wondered what point that section of a review serves as attractiveness is so subjective.

I agree with that completely.

[JAMESCORK]

I have been saying this for years....

[anon361]

I'm of the opinion the if a guy does select all the negative options he's just being a spiteful cunt, his review is aimed to cause maximum damage and really isn't a true reflection of the encounter so it shouldn't be activated in the first place.
If you are going to write any review, positive or negative be honest, tell it how it is (subjective or not, at least a picture is being built) and don't go out of your way to make the lady look overly bad because it just makes you look the bollix and not her..

[Rachel Divine]

Okay, I'm curious; most negative reviews that come in always have the the outcome for the escort's appearance as 'Very Unattractive', as well as the rest of the fields being selected as the worst end of the options spectrum (of course, every location is awful when it is a bad punt, right?).

So, this leads me to believe that it is one of two things:

i) If the escort is that unattractive, why go through with the booking then complain about it?
ii) The escort wasn't actually unattractive, this option was just selected out of spite.

Some people may argue that "because she has a horrible personality, I found her ugly". That doesn't make sense, because we ask for her actual 'physical appearance', not the semantics of her character and how she is perceptually portrayed as a result of it.

Call me sceptical, but this is pretty much sleeping with the enemy, is it not?

People can not hang around seeing escorts all day. I think the majority have a few hours spare or less in a day to have the company of a sexy lady.

If her pictures are photoshoped ( a lot ) then she might be unattractive in person.

There is also , a good punt , maybe the customer didnt like the location, yet he will tick happy , or value for money , the same , only to give that green review ...

[samlad]

People can not hang around seeing escorts all day. I think the majority have a few hours spare or less in a day to have the company of a sexy lady.

If her pictures are photoshoped ( a lot ) then she might be unattractive in person.

There is also , a good punt , maybe the customer didnt like the location, yet he will tick happy , or value for money , the same , only to give that green review ...

I agree, it works both ways, good point.

[Rachel Divine]

I agree, it works both ways, good point.

Im sure accurate , recent , not heavy photoshoped pictures will give much less to the customer to moan about.

The majority dont do it anyway ...