Non-sexually explicit reviews

[samlad]

Dear reviewers,

Please note that the following message:

This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!

actually means:

"This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!"

Thank you

Sam,

On behalf of the Communities Team

[bluefan1]

Dear reviewers,

Please note that the following message:

This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!



actually means:

"This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!"

Thank you

Sam,

On behalf of the Communities Team

Tough day at the editing desk, Sam?

[samlad]

Tough day at the editing desk, Sam?

No, just a tough audience

[Cable87]

Dear reviewers,

Please note that the following message:

This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!

actually means:

"This advertiser asks that clients do not leave sexually explicit reviews!"

Thank you

Sam,

On behalf of the Communities Team

Most of the ladies I've reviewed or read reviews for in the last 9 months or so all seem to have opted-out of allowing the 'Favourites Enjoyed' feature anyway, which makes for a less 'descriptive' review of the service in and of itself, never mind being asked NOT to go into any kind of detail 'descriptive AT ALL in the actual written part of it! Most reviews/reviewers are hardly all that articulate, so I have found that reading those reviews like that have been decidedly LESS INFORMATIVE ans/or useful when making my own decisions as to whom I visit.

That being said, I know and understand that it is at the ladies discretion regarding what she will/will not allow to be said about her in her reviews. It all seems to be a stop-gap measure to keep the reviews from getting either too 'naughty', but perhaps more so to prevent BAD reviews from going into real detail about the 'how and why' the encounter was bad... but anyway, whatever the ladies want.

[samlad]

Most of the ladies I've reviewed or read reviews for in the last 9 months or so all seem to have opted-out of allowing the 'Favourites Enjoyed' feature anyway, which makes for a less 'descriptive' review of the service in and of itself, never mind being asked NOT to go into any kind of detail 'descriptive AT ALL in the actual written part of it! Most reviews/reviewers are hardly all that articulate, so I have found that reading those reviews like that have been decidedly LESS INFORMATIVE ans/or useful when making my own decisions as to whom I visit.

That being said, I know and understand that it is at the ladies discretion regarding what she will/will not allow to be said about her in her reviews. It all seems to be a stop-gap measure to keep the reviews from getting either too 'naughty', but perhaps more so to prevent BAD reviews from going into real detail about the 'how and why' the encounter was bad... but anyway, whatever the ladies want.

I think a lot of it is more to do with a client's perception of the encounter:

A client's perspective:






What actually happened:

[Lara Mills]

Most of the ladies I've reviewed or read reviews for in the last 9 months or so all seem to have opted-out of allowing the 'Favourites Enjoyed' feature anyway, which makes for a less 'descriptive' review of the service in and of itself, never mind being asked NOT to go into any kind of detail 'descriptive AT ALL in the actual written part of it! Most reviews/reviewers are hardly all that articulate, so I have found that reading those reviews like that have been decidedly LESS INFORMATIVE ans/or useful when making my own decisions as to whom I visit.

That being said, I know and understand that it is at the ladies discretion regarding what she will/will not allow to be said about her in her reviews. It all seems to be a stop-gap measure to keep the reviews from getting either too 'naughty', but perhaps more so to prevent BAD reviews from going into real detail about the 'how and why' the encounter was bad... but anyway, whatever the ladies want.

People can still be descriptive without being explicit. For example, instead of writing a list of favourites enjoyed (as some do since they cannot use the tick-boxes) they could explain that the escort catered to their needs or requirements.

It is when they see the words "do not leave sexually explicit reviews" and then go "that must mean I must go into graphic detail about every moment" that we have issues with. When we are moderating reviews, we end up having to take out the explicit parts if the escort has requested for them not to be included, which can take away from the review and isn't what the reviewer had in mind. It would be far better if the reviewer were to follow the rules in order to get their point across properly, without us having to remove parts that they see as important.

[Cable87]

I think a lot of it is more to do with a client's perception of the encounter:

A client's perspective:






What actually happened:

Ah ha, ha ha... You're hilarious...

A pithy response to a valid point, but it's your world there, boss. It's interesting to hear the point of view regarding encounters between escorts and clients from the perspective of a guy who claims he DOESN'T PUNT... Perhaps it's best to keep speculation about the 'accuracy' of descriptions of escort encounters discussed in reviews to a minimum-- or at least left to those who were actually IN THE ROOM.

[Clyde]

Everyone wants a review to boost the business bit I know chatting to a few of the ladies there's that cringe factor like what did I do or not do .... I remember when I got the review ( yes one measly review ) I have to say there was a bit of embarrasment, I know I got some slagging after ... Lol

[Cable87]

People can still be descriptive without being explicit. For example, instead of writing a list of favourites enjoyed (as some do since they cannot use the tick-boxes) they could explain that the escort catered to their needs or requirements.

It is when they see the words "do not leave sexually explicit reviews" and then go "that must mean I must go into graphic detail about every moment" that we have issues with. When we are moderating reviews, we end up having to take out the explicit parts if the escort has requested for them not to be included, which can take away from the review and isn't what the reviewer had in mind. It would be far better if the reviewer were to follow the rules in order to get their point across properly, without us having to remove parts that they see as important.

Indeed, it certainly WOULD be better if people simply 'followed the rules', as you've said, but guess what??? It is worth noting that this is a responsibility which the E-I Staff have decided to take-on themselves, since they've stripped our own review moderators of their responsibilities-- you wanted to do the work, now that's EXACTLY what you get to do!

And my original point is that I feel that for most reviewers, that the restrictions on explicit descriptions may make for reviews which, frankly, make for a rather dull read, as many don't have the inclination (let alone the vocabulary) to go about outlining the encounter in an otherwise 'tasteful' or 'within the bounds' sort of way. Most reviews may as well have been written by cavemen:

"I go see girl. Girl pretty. Girl give good sex. Girl give all things me want. Girl nice. I see girl many more times."

--Caveman Cable

[funlover12]

Indeed, it certainly WOULD be better if people simply 'followed the rules', as you've said, but guess what??? It is worth noting that this is a responsibility which the E-I Staff have decided to take-on themselves, since they've stripped our own review moderators of their responsibilities-- you wanted to do the work, now that's EXACTLY what you get to do!

was just thinkin the same. you made your beds guys