Escort of the Month RULES - Reminder for everyone

[samlad]

Just enough rated to make sure she doesn't win, based on the fact she was online at the time the client said they met her. So if the client put in the wrong time it's ratted.

Would be interesting to see what would happen if they put previous winners to the same test. Anyway time to move to something else.

That's not true. If there is an issue with the time/date, this is clarified with the reviewer first. It depends on the circumstances.

[anon361]

Just enough rated to make sure she doesn't win, based on the fact she was online at the time the client said they met her. So if the client put in the wrong time it's ratted.

Would be interesting to see what would happen if they put previous winners to the same test. Anyway time to move to something else.

That wouldn't be fair, I've often be in my car 5 mins after leaving the lady looking at the boards or writting her review and with time slots 1hr apart on the review system If I say the appointment was for 7 and I'm online at 7:30 I could be ratted..

[simplesimon]

Jack Daniels saw her 21.12.12 but she posted at 12.10 not ratted
Mr Gear saw her 29.11.12 But two posts put up 23.38 and 23.27 not ratted

Not suggesting they did not see her
obviously someone else posted but why are they not ratted also ??

[RicFlair]

Just enough rated to make sure she doesn't win, based on the fact she was online at the time the client said they met her. So if the client put in the wrong time it's ratted.

Would be interesting to see what would happen if they put previous winners to the same test. Anyway time to move to something else.

Its not just that dude. Like I said in my post. Samlad has his evidence. Mine was seperate and different to his. There's more going on here than you think and its really not the type of stuff to discuss on the forum. Its not fair to other people and its really nobodys business. The folks behind this tried this shit before and were caught and it was dealt with privately without the details being disgust on the forum.

Its just silly fixing by silly people. You can choose to take my word for it or not. Either way its dealt with and we're moving on.

Unlike you, I have a dog in this fight, my competition, my project. I've done 52 consecutive competitions and its a lot of work. I know a fix when I see one and its actaually at my discretion to disqualify someone or not. Its a fully sanctioned competition by E-I and I am essentially awarding free advertising to Escorts on behalf of E-I. That's not my money. That's E-I's. So if I'm going to do it. I have to do it right.

[samlad]

Jack Daniels saw her 21.12.12 but she posted at 12.10 not ratted
Mr Gear saw her 29.11.12 But two posts put up 23.38 and 23.27 not ratted

Not suggesting they did not see her
obviously someone else posted but why are they not ratted also ??

Okay, let me sum this up again for you....

Raquel's reviews are ratted because someone else was using her account during the times of these appointments. The reviews that are not ratted are not ratted because there was no activity on her account during those bookings.

The rats are there to represent suspicious activity of Raquel, not the clients. Does it not occur to you that while you were visiting Raquel, someone was logged into her account posting from it and possibly reading the PM exchanges between 'her' and her clients?

That is why they are ratted and she is banned (temporarily). I have spoken to her about this and she understands this, albeit she is not happy about it, but there you go.

If I thought that the reviewers were fake, they would all be banned for submitting fake reviews. Simple.

I am locking this as it has become a continuation thread of an already locked issue. It is also diluting the points Ric has made.