Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: Judge says 'Woman's body should have prevented rape'

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Default

    That Judge is an idiot, whatever country he is in.

    I am fairly certain that his legal career will come to a swift end on the back of his personal opinion


    "The commission found that Johnson's view that a victim must resist to be a real victim of sexual assault was his opinion,

    not the law. Since 1980, California law has not required rape victims to prove they resisted or were prevented from resisting."




    I think Ireland has a similar law on the books, since 1982 ??

    What's on in the UK ?
    I do what I want. I cannot do otherwise.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,309
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephanie View Post
    That Judge is an idiot, whatever country he is in.

    I am fairly certain that his legal career will come to a swift end on the back of his personal opinion


    "The commission found that Johnson's view that a victim must resist to be a real victim of sexual assault was his opinion,

    not the law. Since 1980, California law has not required rape victims to prove they resisted or were prevented from resisting."




    I think Ireland has a similar law on the books, since 1982 ??

    What's on in the UK ?
    In Ireland and the UK it's not on the books as such, it's a common law position.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Banjaxed For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserStephanie (17-12-12)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •